CIFS: Fix a spurious error in cifs_push_posix_locks
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stevef@smf-gateway.(none)>
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 5e64748..8e02dbd 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -960,9 +960,9 @@
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&locks_to_send);
/*
- * Allocating count locks is enough because no locks can be added to
- * the list while we are holding cinode->lock_mutex that protects
- * locking operations of this inode.
+ * Allocating count locks is enough because no FL_POSIX locks can be
+ * added to the list while we are holding cinode->lock_mutex that
+ * protects locking operations of this inode.
*/
for (; i < count; i++) {
lck = kmalloc(sizeof(struct lock_to_push), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -973,18 +973,20 @@
list_add_tail(&lck->llist, &locks_to_send);
}
- i = 0;
el = locks_to_send.next;
lock_flocks();
cifs_for_each_lock(cfile->dentry->d_inode, before) {
- if (el == &locks_to_send) {
- /* something is really wrong */
- cERROR(1, "Can't push all brlocks!");
- break;
- }
flock = *before;
if ((flock->fl_flags & FL_POSIX) == 0)
continue;
+ if (el == &locks_to_send) {
+ /*
+ * The list ended. We don't have enough allocated
+ * structures - something is really wrong.
+ */
+ cERROR(1, "Can't push all brlocks!");
+ break;
+ }
length = 1 + flock->fl_end - flock->fl_start;
if (flock->fl_type == F_RDLCK || flock->fl_type == F_SHLCK)
type = CIFS_RDLCK;
@@ -996,7 +998,6 @@
lck->length = length;
lck->type = type;
lck->offset = flock->fl_start;
- i++;
el = el->next;
}
unlock_flocks();