[PATCH] i386: fix uses of user_mode() vs. user_mode_vm()
>commit 76381fee7e8feb4c22be636aa5d4765dbe4fbf9e
>Author: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@cl.cam.ac.uk>
>Date: Thu Jun 23 00:08:46 2005 -0700
>
> [PATCH] xen: x86_64: use more usermode macro
>
> Make use of the user_mode macro where it's possible. This is useful for Xen
> because it will need only to redefine only the macro to a hypervisor call.
I am of the opinion that the above changeset is incomplete, i.e. it missed
converting some previous uses of user_mode to user_mode_vm. While most of
them could be considered just cosmetical, at least the one in die_nmi
doesn't appear to be.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c b/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c
index d49dbe8..e3c5fca0 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
return 1;
local_irq_disable();
- if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+ if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) {
crash_fixup_ss_esp(&fixed_regs, regs);
regs = &fixed_regs;
}
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/process.c b/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
index 0480454..299e616 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
printk("EIP: %04x:[<%08lx>] CPU: %d\n",0xffff & regs->xcs,regs->eip, smp_processor_id());
print_symbol("EIP is at %s\n", regs->eip);
- if (user_mode(regs))
+ if (user_mode_vm(regs))
printk(" ESP: %04x:%08lx",0xffff & regs->xss,regs->esp);
printk(" EFLAGS: %08lx %s (%s %.*s)\n",
regs->eflags, print_tainted(), system_utsname.release,
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c
index d510de7..a807a2d 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@
esp = (unsigned long) (®s->esp);
savesegment(ss, ss);
- if (user_mode(regs)) {
+ if (user_mode_vm(regs)) {
in_kernel = 0;
esp = regs->esp;
ss = regs->xss & 0xffff;
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@
/* If we are in kernel we are probably nested up pretty bad
* and might aswell get out now while we still can.
*/
- if (!user_mode(regs)) {
+ if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) {
current->thread.trap_no = 2;
crash_kexec(regs);
}