)]}'
{
  "commit": "e4abb5d4f7ddabc1fc7c392cf0a10d8e5868c9ca",
  "tree": "9d9c71a70afd922d4b371b0243ab149456d634ca",
  "parents": [
    "8a016db386195b193e2a8aeddff9fe937dcb7a40"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
    "email": "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl",
    "time": "Tue Jun 02 16:08:20 2009 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Ingo Molnar",
    "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
    "time": "Tue Jun 02 21:45:31 2009 +0200"
  },
  "message": "perf_counter: x86: Emulate longer sample periods\n\nDo as Power already does, emulate sample periods up to 2^63-1 by\ncomposing them of smaller values limited by hardware capabilities.\nOnly once we wrap the software period do we generate an overflow\nevent.\n\nJust 10 lines of new code.\n\nReported-by: Stephane Eranian \u003ceranian@googlemail.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra \u003ca.p.zijlstra@chello.nl\u003e\nCc: Mike Galbraith \u003cefault@gmx.de\u003e\nCc: Paul Mackerras \u003cpaulus@samba.org\u003e\nCc: Corey Ashford \u003ccjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com\u003e\nCc: Marcelo Tosatti \u003cmtosatti@redhat.com\u003e\nCc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo \u003cacme@redhat.com\u003e\nCc: Thomas Gleixner \u003ctglx@linutronix.de\u003e\nCc: John Kacur \u003cjkacur@redhat.com\u003e\nLKML-Reference: \u003cnew-submission\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "9e144fbebd209fc45b34b2499cc8113bbc7b6bc8",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c",
      "new_id": "904571bea71048e9dfc44b2e3e8cf45701517153",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c"
    }
  ]
}
