memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() with generic memblock calls
With the previous changes, generic NUMA aware memblock API has feature
parity with memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(). There currently are
two users - x86 setup_node_data() and __alloc_memory_core_early() in
nobootmem.c.
This patch converts the former to use memblock_alloc_nid() and the
latter memblock_find_range_in_node(), and kills
memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() and related functions including
find_memory_early_core_early() in page_alloc.c.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index 5b0eb06..c781626 100644
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
@@ -41,8 +41,7 @@
if (limit > memblock.current_limit)
limit = memblock.current_limit;
- addr = find_memory_core_early(nid, size, align, goal, limit);
-
+ addr = memblock_find_in_range_node(goal, limit, size, align, nid);
if (!addr)
return NULL;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 902f03a..8ab5e5e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3779,73 +3779,6 @@
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
-/*
- * Basic iterator support. Return the last range of PFNs for a node
- * Note: nid == MAX_NUMNODES returns last region regardless of node
- */
-static int __meminit last_active_region_index_in_nid(int nid)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = nr_nodemap_entries - 1; i >= 0; i--)
- if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || early_node_map[i].nid == nid)
- return i;
-
- return -1;
-}
-
-/*
- * Basic iterator support. Return the previous active range of PFNs for a node
- * Note: nid == MAX_NUMNODES returns next region regardless of node
- */
-static int __meminit previous_active_region_index_in_nid(int index, int nid)
-{
- for (index = index - 1; index >= 0; index--)
- if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || early_node_map[index].nid == nid)
- return index;
-
- return -1;
-}
-
-#define for_each_active_range_index_in_nid_reverse(i, nid) \
- for (i = last_active_region_index_in_nid(nid); i != -1; \
- i = previous_active_region_index_in_nid(i, nid))
-
-u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
- u64 goal, u64 limit)
-{
- int i;
-
- /* Need to go over early_node_map to find out good range for node */
- for_each_active_range_index_in_nid_reverse(i, nid) {
- u64 addr;
- u64 ei_start, ei_last;
- u64 final_start, final_end;
-
- ei_last = early_node_map[i].end_pfn;
- ei_last <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
- ei_start = early_node_map[i].start_pfn;
- ei_start <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
-
- final_start = max(ei_start, goal);
- final_end = min(ei_last, limit);
-
- if (final_start >= final_end)
- continue;
-
- addr = memblock_find_in_range(final_start, final_end, size, align);
-
- if (!addr)
- continue;
-
- return addr;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
int __init add_from_early_node_map(struct range *range, int az,
int nr_range, int nid)
{