)]}'
{
  "commit": "ec38fa2b35f13e7fa1d676a5bc997d0df1b02574",
  "tree": "df2ffd6eb0af65516cf0aae37c80c9fd1eee5dc6",
  "parents": [
    "1b871826b3dfcdcd78140d17c00e452eec6c12a4"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Jean Delvare",
    "email": "khali@linux-fr.org",
    "time": "Sun Oct 26 17:04:39 2008 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Jean Delvare",
    "email": "khali@linux-fr.org",
    "time": "Sun Oct 26 17:04:39 2008 +0100"
  },
  "message": "hwmon: (lm90) Fix handling of hysteresis value\n\nThere are several problems in the way the hysteresis value is handled\nby the lm90 driver:\n\n* In show_temphyst(), specific handling of the MAX6646 is missing, so\n  the hysteresis is reported incorrectly if the critical temperature\n  is over 127 degrees C.\n* In set_temphyst(), the new hysteresis register value is written to\n  the chip but data-\u003etemp_hyst isn\u0027t updated accordingly, so there is\n  a short period of time (up to 2 seconds) where the old hystereris\n  value will be returned while the new one is already active.\n* In set_temphyst(), the critical temperature which is used as a base\n  to compute the value of the hysteresis register lacks\n  device-specific handling. As a result, the value of the hysteresis\n  register might be incorrect for the ADT7461 and MAX6646 chips.\n\nFix these 3 bugs.\n\nSigned-off-by: Jean Delvare \u003ckhali@linux-fr.org\u003e\nCc: Ben Hutchings \u003cbhutchings@solarflare.com\u003e\nCc: Nate Case \u003cncase@xes-inc.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "3edeebc0b8355361532becdcb246d6493924be44",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "drivers/hwmon/lm90.c",
      "new_id": "6242e72a82c18e2ce4276d914277c5c6612fea15",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "drivers/hwmon/lm90.c"
    }
  ]
}