[PATCH] fs: use list_move()
This patch converts the combination of list_del(A) and list_add(A, B) to
list_move(A, B) under fs/.
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Acked-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com>
Cc: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/erase.c b/fs/jffs2/erase.c
index 1862e8b..b8886f0 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/erase.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/erase.c
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@
if (!instr) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "kmalloc for struct erase_info in jffs2_erase_block failed. Refiling block for later\n");
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
- list_del(&jeb->list);
- list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
+ list_move(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
@@ -86,8 +85,7 @@
/* Erase failed immediately. Refile it on the list */
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Erase at 0x%08x failed: %d. Refiling on erase_pending_list\n", jeb->offset, ret));
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
- list_del(&jeb->list);
- list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
+ list_move(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
@@ -161,8 +159,7 @@
{
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Erase completed successfully at 0x%08x\n", jeb->offset));
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
- list_del(&jeb->list);
- list_add_tail(&jeb->list, &c->erase_complete_list);
+ list_move_tail(&jeb->list, &c->erase_complete_list);
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
/* Ensure that kupdated calls us again to mark them clean */
jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c);
@@ -178,8 +175,7 @@
if (!jffs2_write_nand_badblock(c, jeb, bad_offset)) {
/* We'd like to give this block another try. */
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
- list_del(&jeb->list);
- list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
+ list_move(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
@@ -191,8 +187,7 @@
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->bad_size += c->sector_size;
- list_del(&jeb->list);
- list_add(&jeb->list, &c->bad_list);
+ list_move(&jeb->list, &c->bad_list);
c->nr_erasing_blocks--;
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
wake_up(&c->erase_wait);
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
index 8bedfd2..ac0c350 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
@@ -211,8 +211,7 @@
struct jffs2_eraseblock *ejeb;
ejeb = list_entry(c->erasable_list.next, struct jffs2_eraseblock, list);
- list_del(&ejeb->list);
- list_add_tail(&ejeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
+ list_move_tail(&ejeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->nr_erasing_blocks++;
jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c);
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_find_nextblock: Triggering erase of erasable block at 0x%08x\n",
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c b/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c
index a7f153f..b9b7007 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c
@@ -495,8 +495,7 @@
/* Fix up the original jeb now it's on the bad_list */
if (first_raw == jeb->first_node) {
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Failing block at %08x is now empty. Moving to erase_pending_list\n", jeb->offset));
- list_del(&jeb->list);
- list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
+ list_move(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->nr_erasing_blocks++;
jffs2_erase_pending_trigger(c);
}