time: Explicitly use u32 instead of int for shift values
Ingo noted that using a u32 instead of int for shift values
would be better to make sure the compiler doesn't unnecessarily
use complex signed arithmetic.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1342156917-25092-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index c2f12aa..4fd83df 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
/* NTP adjusted clock multiplier */
u32 mult;
/* The shift value of the current clocksource. */
- int shift;
+ u32 shift;
/* Number of clock cycles in one NTP interval. */
cycle_t cycle_interval;
/* Number of clock shifted nano seconds in one NTP interval. */
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
s64 ntp_error;
/* Shift conversion between clock shifted nano seconds and
* ntp shifted nano seconds. */
- int ntp_error_shift;
+ u32 ntp_error_shift;
/* The current time */
struct timespec xtime;
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@
*
* Returns the unconsumed cycles.
*/
-static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(cycle_t offset, int shift)
+static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(cycle_t offset, u32 shift)
{
u64 nsecps = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << timekeeper.shift;
u64 raw_nsecs;