| Greg Banks | b5cbc36 | 2009-03-26 17:45:27 +1100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 |  | 
 | 2 | Kernel NFS Server Statistics | 
 | 3 | ============================ | 
 | 4 |  | 
 | 5 | This document describes the format and semantics of the statistics | 
 | 6 | which the kernel NFS server makes available to userspace.  These | 
 | 7 | statistics are available in several text form pseudo files, each of | 
 | 8 | which is described separately below. | 
 | 9 |  | 
 | 10 | In most cases you don't need to know these formats, as the nfsstat(8) | 
 | 11 | program from the nfs-utils distribution provides a helpful command-line | 
 | 12 | interface for extracting and printing them. | 
 | 13 |  | 
 | 14 | All the files described here are formatted as a sequence of text lines, | 
 | 15 | separated by newline '\n' characters.  Lines beginning with a hash | 
 | 16 | '#' character are comments intended for humans and should be ignored | 
 | 17 | by parsing routines.  All other lines contain a sequence of fields | 
 | 18 | separated by whitespace. | 
 | 19 |  | 
 | 20 | /proc/fs/nfsd/pool_stats | 
 | 21 | ------------------------ | 
 | 22 |  | 
 | 23 | This file is available in kernels from 2.6.30 onwards, if the | 
 | 24 | /proc/fs/nfsd filesystem is mounted (it almost always should be). | 
 | 25 |  | 
 | 26 | The first line is a comment which describes the fields present in | 
 | 27 | all the other lines.  The other lines present the following data as | 
 | 28 | a sequence of unsigned decimal numeric fields.  One line is shown | 
 | 29 | for each NFS thread pool. | 
 | 30 |  | 
 | 31 | All counters are 64 bits wide and wrap naturally.  There is no way | 
 | 32 | to zero these counters, instead applications should do their own | 
 | 33 | rate conversion. | 
 | 34 |  | 
 | 35 | pool | 
 | 36 | 	The id number of the NFS thread pool to which this line applies. | 
 | 37 | 	This number does not change. | 
 | 38 |  | 
 | 39 | 	Thread pool ids are a contiguous set of small integers starting | 
 | 40 | 	at zero.  The maximum value depends on the thread pool mode, but | 
 | 41 | 	currently cannot be larger than the number of CPUs in the system. | 
 | 42 | 	Note that in the default case there will be a single thread pool | 
 | 43 | 	which contains all the nfsd threads and all the CPUs in the system, | 
 | 44 | 	and thus this file will have a single line with a pool id of "0". | 
 | 45 |  | 
 | 46 | packets-arrived | 
 | 47 | 	Counts how many NFS packets have arrived.  More precisely, this | 
 | 48 | 	is the number of times that the network stack has notified the | 
 | 49 | 	sunrpc server layer that new data may be available on a transport | 
 | 50 | 	(e.g. an NFS or UDP socket or an NFS/RDMA endpoint). | 
 | 51 |  | 
 | 52 | 	Depending on the NFS workload patterns and various network stack | 
 | 53 | 	effects (such as Large Receive Offload) which can combine packets | 
 | 54 | 	on the wire, this may be either more or less than the number | 
 | 55 | 	of NFS calls received (which statistic is available elsewhere). | 
 | 56 | 	However this is a more accurate and less workload-dependent measure | 
 | 57 | 	of how much CPU load is being placed on the sunrpc server layer | 
 | 58 | 	due to NFS network traffic. | 
 | 59 |  | 
 | 60 | sockets-enqueued | 
 | 61 | 	Counts how many times an NFS transport is enqueued to wait for | 
 | 62 | 	an nfsd thread to service it, i.e. no nfsd thread was considered | 
 | 63 | 	available. | 
 | 64 |  | 
 | 65 | 	The circumstance this statistic tracks indicates that there was NFS | 
 | 66 | 	network-facing work to be done but it couldn't be done immediately, | 
 | 67 | 	thus introducing a small delay in servicing NFS calls.  The ideal | 
 | 68 | 	rate of change for this counter is zero; significantly non-zero | 
 | 69 | 	values may indicate a performance limitation. | 
 | 70 |  | 
 | 71 | 	This can happen either because there are too few nfsd threads in the | 
 | 72 | 	thread pool for the NFS workload (the workload is thread-limited), | 
 | 73 | 	or because the NFS workload needs more CPU time than is available in | 
 | 74 | 	the thread pool (the workload is CPU-limited).  In the former case, | 
 | 75 | 	configuring more nfsd threads will probably improve the performance | 
 | 76 | 	of the NFS workload.  In the latter case, the sunrpc server layer is | 
 | 77 | 	already choosing not to wake idle nfsd threads because there are too | 
 | 78 | 	many nfsd threads which want to run but cannot, so configuring more | 
 | 79 | 	nfsd threads will make no difference whatsoever.  The overloads-avoided | 
 | 80 | 	statistic (see below) can be used to distinguish these cases. | 
 | 81 |  | 
 | 82 | threads-woken | 
 | 83 | 	Counts how many times an idle nfsd thread is woken to try to | 
 | 84 | 	receive some data from an NFS transport. | 
 | 85 |  | 
 | 86 | 	This statistic tracks the circumstance where incoming | 
 | 87 | 	network-facing NFS work is being handled quickly, which is a good | 
 | 88 | 	thing.  The ideal rate of change for this counter will be close | 
 | 89 | 	to but less than the rate of change of the packets-arrived counter. | 
 | 90 |  | 
 | 91 | overloads-avoided | 
 | 92 | 	Counts how many times the sunrpc server layer chose not to wake an | 
 | 93 | 	nfsd thread, despite the presence of idle nfsd threads, because | 
 | 94 | 	too many nfsd threads had been recently woken but could not get | 
 | 95 | 	enough CPU time to actually run. | 
 | 96 |  | 
 | 97 | 	This statistic counts a circumstance where the sunrpc layer | 
 | 98 | 	heuristically avoids overloading the CPU scheduler with too many | 
 | 99 | 	runnable nfsd threads.  The ideal rate of change for this counter | 
 | 100 | 	is zero.  Significant non-zero values indicate that the workload | 
 | 101 | 	is CPU limited.  Usually this is associated with heavy CPU usage | 
 | 102 | 	on all the CPUs in the nfsd thread pool. | 
 | 103 |  | 
 | 104 | 	If a sustained large overloads-avoided rate is detected on a pool, | 
 | 105 | 	the top(1) utility should be used to check for the following | 
 | 106 | 	pattern of CPU usage on all the CPUs associated with the given | 
 | 107 | 	nfsd thread pool. | 
 | 108 |  | 
 | 109 | 	 - %us ~= 0 (as you're *NOT* running applications on your NFS server) | 
 | 110 |  | 
 | 111 | 	 - %wa ~= 0 | 
 | 112 |  | 
 | 113 | 	 - %id ~= 0 | 
 | 114 |  | 
 | 115 | 	 - %sy + %hi + %si ~= 100 | 
 | 116 |  | 
 | 117 | 	If this pattern is seen, configuring more nfsd threads will *not* | 
 | 118 | 	improve the performance of the workload.  If this patten is not | 
 | 119 | 	seen, then something more subtle is wrong. | 
 | 120 |  | 
 | 121 | threads-timedout | 
 | 122 | 	Counts how many times an nfsd thread triggered an idle timeout, | 
 | 123 | 	i.e. was not woken to handle any incoming network packets for | 
 | 124 | 	some time. | 
 | 125 |  | 
 | 126 | 	This statistic counts a circumstance where there are more nfsd | 
 | 127 | 	threads configured than can be used by the NFS workload.  This is | 
 | 128 | 	a clue that the number of nfsd threads can be reduced without | 
 | 129 | 	affecting performance.  Unfortunately, it's only a clue and not | 
 | 130 | 	a strong indication, for a couple of reasons: | 
 | 131 |  | 
 | 132 | 	 - Currently the rate at which the counter is incremented is quite | 
 | 133 | 	   slow; the idle timeout is 60 minutes.  Unless the NFS workload | 
 | 134 | 	   remains constant for hours at a time, this counter is unlikely | 
 | 135 | 	   to be providing information that is still useful. | 
 | 136 |  | 
 | 137 | 	 - It is usually a wise policy to provide some slack, | 
 | 138 | 	   i.e. configure a few more nfsds than are currently needed, | 
 | 139 | 	   to allow for future spikes in load. | 
 | 140 |  | 
 | 141 |  | 
 | 142 | Note that incoming packets on NFS transports will be dealt with in | 
 | 143 | one of three ways.  An nfsd thread can be woken (threads-woken counts | 
 | 144 | this case), or the transport can be enqueued for later attention | 
 | 145 | (sockets-enqueued counts this case), or the packet can be temporarily | 
 | 146 | deferred because the transport is currently being used by an nfsd | 
 | 147 | thread.  This last case is not very interesting and is not explicitly | 
 | 148 | counted, but can be inferred from the other counters thus: | 
 | 149 |  | 
 | 150 | packets-deferred = packets-arrived - ( sockets-enqueued + threads-woken ) | 
 | 151 |  | 
 | 152 |  | 
 | 153 | More | 
 | 154 | ---- | 
 | 155 | Descriptions of the other statistics file should go here. | 
 | 156 |  | 
 | 157 |  | 
 | 158 | Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com> | 
 | 159 | 26 Mar 2009 |