| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Started by Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> | 
 | 2 |  | 
 | 3 | The robust futex ABI | 
 | 4 | -------------------- | 
 | 5 |  | 
 | 6 | Robust_futexes provide a mechanism that is used in addition to normal | 
 | 7 | futexes, for kernel assist of cleanup of held locks on task exit. | 
 | 8 |  | 
 | 9 | The interesting data as to what futexes a thread is holding is kept on a | 
 | 10 | linked list in user space, where it can be updated efficiently as locks | 
 | 11 | are taken and dropped, without kernel intervention.  The only additional | 
 | 12 | kernel intervention required for robust_futexes above and beyond what is | 
 | 13 | required for futexes is: | 
 | 14 |  | 
 | 15 |  1) a one time call, per thread, to tell the kernel where its list of | 
 | 16 |     held robust_futexes begins, and | 
 | 17 |  2) internal kernel code at exit, to handle any listed locks held | 
 | 18 |     by the exiting thread. | 
 | 19 |  | 
 | 20 | The existing normal futexes already provide a "Fast Userspace Locking" | 
 | 21 | mechanism, which handles uncontested locking without needing a system | 
 | 22 | call, and handles contested locking by maintaining a list of waiting | 
 | 23 | threads in the kernel.  Options on the sys_futex(2) system call support | 
 | 24 | waiting on a particular futex, and waking up the next waiter on a | 
 | 25 | particular futex. | 
 | 26 |  | 
 | 27 | For robust_futexes to work, the user code (typically in a library such | 
 | 28 | as glibc linked with the application) has to manage and place the | 
 | 29 | necessary list elements exactly as the kernel expects them.  If it fails | 
 | 30 | to do so, then improperly listed locks will not be cleaned up on exit, | 
 | 31 | probably causing deadlock or other such failure of the other threads | 
 | 32 | waiting on the same locks. | 
 | 33 |  | 
 | 34 | A thread that anticipates possibly using robust_futexes should first | 
 | 35 | issue the system call: | 
 | 36 |  | 
 | 37 |     asmlinkage long | 
 | 38 |     sys_set_robust_list(struct robust_list_head __user *head, size_t len); | 
 | 39 |  | 
 | 40 | The pointer 'head' points to a structure in the threads address space | 
 | 41 | consisting of three words.  Each word is 32 bits on 32 bit arch's, or 64 | 
 | 42 | bits on 64 bit arch's, and local byte order.  Each thread should have | 
 | 43 | its own thread private 'head'. | 
 | 44 |  | 
 | 45 | If a thread is running in 32 bit compatibility mode on a 64 native arch | 
 | 46 | kernel, then it can actually have two such structures - one using 32 bit | 
 | 47 | words for 32 bit compatibility mode, and one using 64 bit words for 64 | 
 | 48 | bit native mode.  The kernel, if it is a 64 bit kernel supporting 32 bit | 
 | 49 | compatibility mode, will attempt to process both lists on each task | 
 | 50 | exit, if the corresponding sys_set_robust_list() call has been made to | 
 | 51 | setup that list. | 
 | 52 |  | 
 | 53 |   The first word in the memory structure at 'head' contains a | 
 | 54 |   pointer to a single linked list of 'lock entries', one per lock, | 
 | 55 |   as described below.  If the list is empty, the pointer will point | 
 | 56 |   to itself, 'head'.  The last 'lock entry' points back to the 'head'. | 
 | 57 |  | 
 | 58 |   The second word, called 'offset', specifies the offset from the | 
 | 59 |   address of the associated 'lock entry', plus or minus, of what will | 
 | 60 |   be called the 'lock word', from that 'lock entry'.  The 'lock word' | 
 | 61 |   is always a 32 bit word, unlike the other words above.  The 'lock | 
 | 62 |   word' holds 3 flag bits in the upper 3 bits, and the thread id (TID) | 
 | 63 |   of the thread holding the lock in the bottom 29 bits.  See further | 
 | 64 |   below for a description of the flag bits. | 
 | 65 |  | 
 | 66 |   The third word, called 'list_op_pending', contains transient copy of | 
 | 67 |   the address of the 'lock entry', during list insertion and removal, | 
 | 68 |   and is needed to correctly resolve races should a thread exit while | 
 | 69 |   in the middle of a locking or unlocking operation. | 
 | 70 |  | 
 | 71 | Each 'lock entry' on the single linked list starting at 'head' consists | 
 | 72 | of just a single word, pointing to the next 'lock entry', or back to | 
 | 73 | 'head' if there are no more entries.  In addition, nearby to each 'lock | 
 | 74 | entry', at an offset from the 'lock entry' specified by the 'offset' | 
 | 75 | word, is one 'lock word'. | 
 | 76 |  | 
 | 77 | The 'lock word' is always 32 bits, and is intended to be the same 32 bit | 
 | 78 | lock variable used by the futex mechanism, in conjunction with | 
 | 79 | robust_futexes.  The kernel will only be able to wakeup the next thread | 
 | 80 | waiting for a lock on a threads exit if that next thread used the futex | 
 | 81 | mechanism to register the address of that 'lock word' with the kernel. | 
 | 82 |  | 
 | 83 | For each futex lock currently held by a thread, if it wants this | 
 | 84 | robust_futex support for exit cleanup of that lock, it should have one | 
 | 85 | 'lock entry' on this list, with its associated 'lock word' at the | 
 | 86 | specified 'offset'.  Should a thread die while holding any such locks, | 
 | 87 | the kernel will walk this list, mark any such locks with a bit | 
 | 88 | indicating their holder died, and wakeup the next thread waiting for | 
 | 89 | that lock using the futex mechanism. | 
 | 90 |  | 
 | 91 | When a thread has invoked the above system call to indicate it | 
 | 92 | anticipates using robust_futexes, the kernel stores the passed in 'head' | 
 | 93 | pointer for that task.  The task may retrieve that value later on by | 
 | 94 | using the system call: | 
 | 95 |  | 
 | 96 |     asmlinkage long | 
 | 97 |     sys_get_robust_list(int pid, struct robust_list_head __user **head_ptr, | 
 | 98 |                         size_t __user *len_ptr); | 
 | 99 |  | 
 | 100 | It is anticipated that threads will use robust_futexes embedded in | 
 | 101 | larger, user level locking structures, one per lock.  The kernel | 
 | 102 | robust_futex mechanism doesn't care what else is in that structure, so | 
 | 103 | long as the 'offset' to the 'lock word' is the same for all | 
 | 104 | robust_futexes used by that thread.  The thread should link those locks | 
 | 105 | it currently holds using the 'lock entry' pointers.  It may also have | 
 | 106 | other links between the locks, such as the reverse side of a double | 
 | 107 | linked list, but that doesn't matter to the kernel. | 
 | 108 |  | 
 | 109 | By keeping its locks linked this way, on a list starting with a 'head' | 
 | 110 | pointer known to the kernel, the kernel can provide to a thread the | 
 | 111 | essential service available for robust_futexes, which is to help clean | 
 | 112 | up locks held at the time of (a perhaps unexpectedly) exit. | 
 | 113 |  | 
 | 114 | Actual locking and unlocking, during normal operations, is handled | 
 | 115 | entirely by user level code in the contending threads, and by the | 
 | 116 | existing futex mechanism to wait for, and wakeup, locks.  The kernels | 
 | 117 | only essential involvement in robust_futexes is to remember where the | 
 | 118 | list 'head' is, and to walk the list on thread exit, handling locks | 
 | 119 | still held by the departing thread, as described below. | 
 | 120 |  | 
 | 121 | There may exist thousands of futex lock structures in a threads shared | 
 | 122 | memory, on various data structures, at a given point in time. Only those | 
 | 123 | lock structures for locks currently held by that thread should be on | 
 | 124 | that thread's robust_futex linked lock list a given time. | 
 | 125 |  | 
 | 126 | A given futex lock structure in a user shared memory region may be held | 
 | 127 | at different times by any of the threads with access to that region. The | 
 | 128 | thread currently holding such a lock, if any, is marked with the threads | 
 | 129 | TID in the lower 29 bits of the 'lock word'. | 
 | 130 |  | 
 | 131 | When adding or removing a lock from its list of held locks, in order for | 
 | 132 | the kernel to correctly handle lock cleanup regardless of when the task | 
 | 133 | exits (perhaps it gets an unexpected signal 9 in the middle of | 
 | 134 | manipulating this list), the user code must observe the following | 
 | 135 | protocol on 'lock entry' insertion and removal: | 
 | 136 |  | 
 | 137 | On insertion: | 
 | 138 |  1) set the 'list_op_pending' word to the address of the 'lock word' | 
 | 139 |     to be inserted, | 
 | 140 |  2) acquire the futex lock, | 
 | 141 |  3) add the lock entry, with its thread id (TID) in the bottom 29 bits | 
 | 142 |     of the 'lock word', to the linked list starting at 'head', and | 
 | 143 |  4) clear the 'list_op_pending' word. | 
 | 144 |  | 
| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 145 | On removal: | 
 | 146 |  1) set the 'list_op_pending' word to the address of the 'lock word' | 
 | 147 |     to be removed, | 
 | 148 |  2) remove the lock entry for this lock from the 'head' list, | 
 | 149 |  2) release the futex lock, and | 
 | 150 |  2) clear the 'lock_op_pending' word. | 
 | 151 |  | 
 | 152 | On exit, the kernel will consider the address stored in | 
 | 153 | 'list_op_pending' and the address of each 'lock word' found by walking | 
 | 154 | the list starting at 'head'.  For each such address, if the bottom 29 | 
 | 155 | bits of the 'lock word' at offset 'offset' from that address equals the | 
 | 156 | exiting threads TID, then the kernel will do two things: | 
 | 157 |  | 
 | 158 |  1) if bit 31 (0x80000000) is set in that word, then attempt a futex | 
 | 159 |     wakeup on that address, which will waken the next thread that has | 
 | 160 |     used to the futex mechanism to wait on that address, and | 
 | 161 |  2) atomically set  bit 30 (0x40000000) in the 'lock word'. | 
 | 162 |  | 
 | 163 | In the above, bit 31 was set by futex waiters on that lock to indicate | 
 | 164 | they were waiting, and bit 30 is set by the kernel to indicate that the | 
 | 165 | lock owner died holding the lock. | 
 | 166 |  | 
 | 167 | The kernel exit code will silently stop scanning the list further if at | 
 | 168 | any point: | 
 | 169 |  | 
 | 170 |  1) the 'head' pointer or an subsequent linked list pointer | 
 | 171 |     is not a valid address of a user space word | 
 | 172 |  2) the calculated location of the 'lock word' (address plus | 
| Matt LaPlante | 4ae0edc | 2006-11-30 04:58:40 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 173 |     'offset') is not the valid address of a 32 bit user space | 
| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 174 |     word | 
 | 175 |  3) if the list contains more than 1 million (subject to | 
 | 176 |     future kernel configuration changes) elements. | 
 | 177 |  | 
 | 178 | When the kernel sees a list entry whose 'lock word' doesn't have the | 
 | 179 | current threads TID in the lower 29 bits, it does nothing with that | 
 | 180 | entry, and goes on to the next entry. | 
 | 181 |  | 
 | 182 | Bit 29 (0x20000000) of the 'lock word' is reserved for future use. |