| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Started by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> | 
|  | 2 |  | 
|  | 3 | Background | 
|  | 4 | ---------- | 
|  | 5 |  | 
|  | 6 | what are robust futexes? To answer that, we first need to understand | 
|  | 7 | what futexes are: normal futexes are special types of locks that in the | 
|  | 8 | noncontended case can be acquired/released from userspace without having | 
|  | 9 | to enter the kernel. | 
|  | 10 |  | 
|  | 11 | A futex is in essence a user-space address, e.g. a 32-bit lock variable | 
|  | 12 | field. If userspace notices contention (the lock is already owned and | 
|  | 13 | someone else wants to grab it too) then the lock is marked with a value | 
|  | 14 | that says "there's a waiter pending", and the sys_futex(FUTEX_WAIT) | 
|  | 15 | syscall is used to wait for the other guy to release it. The kernel | 
|  | 16 | creates a 'futex queue' internally, so that it can later on match up the | 
|  | 17 | waiter with the waker - without them having to know about each other. | 
|  | 18 | When the owner thread releases the futex, it notices (via the variable | 
|  | 19 | value) that there were waiter(s) pending, and does the | 
|  | 20 | sys_futex(FUTEX_WAKE) syscall to wake them up.  Once all waiters have | 
|  | 21 | taken and released the lock, the futex is again back to 'uncontended' | 
|  | 22 | state, and there's no in-kernel state associated with it. The kernel | 
|  | 23 | completely forgets that there ever was a futex at that address. This | 
|  | 24 | method makes futexes very lightweight and scalable. | 
|  | 25 |  | 
|  | 26 | "Robustness" is about dealing with crashes while holding a lock: if a | 
|  | 27 | process exits prematurely while holding a pthread_mutex_t lock that is | 
|  | 28 | also shared with some other process (e.g. yum segfaults while holding a | 
|  | 29 | pthread_mutex_t, or yum is kill -9-ed), then waiters for that lock need | 
|  | 30 | to be notified that the last owner of the lock exited in some irregular | 
|  | 31 | way. | 
|  | 32 |  | 
|  | 33 | To solve such types of problems, "robust mutex" userspace APIs were | 
|  | 34 | created: pthread_mutex_lock() returns an error value if the owner exits | 
|  | 35 | prematurely - and the new owner can decide whether the data protected by | 
|  | 36 | the lock can be recovered safely. | 
|  | 37 |  | 
|  | 38 | There is a big conceptual problem with futex based mutexes though: it is | 
|  | 39 | the kernel that destroys the owner task (e.g. due to a SEGFAULT), but | 
|  | 40 | the kernel cannot help with the cleanup: if there is no 'futex queue' | 
|  | 41 | (and in most cases there is none, futexes being fast lightweight locks) | 
|  | 42 | then the kernel has no information to clean up after the held lock! | 
|  | 43 | Userspace has no chance to clean up after the lock either - userspace is | 
|  | 44 | the one that crashes, so it has no opportunity to clean up. Catch-22. | 
|  | 45 |  | 
|  | 46 | In practice, when e.g. yum is kill -9-ed (or segfaults), a system reboot | 
|  | 47 | is needed to release that futex based lock. This is one of the leading | 
|  | 48 | bugreports against yum. | 
|  | 49 |  | 
|  | 50 | To solve this problem, the traditional approach was to extend the vma | 
|  | 51 | (virtual memory area descriptor) concept to have a notion of 'pending | 
|  | 52 | robust futexes attached to this area'. This approach requires 3 new | 
|  | 53 | syscall variants to sys_futex(): FUTEX_REGISTER, FUTEX_DEREGISTER and | 
|  | 54 | FUTEX_RECOVER. At do_exit() time, all vmas are searched to see whether | 
|  | 55 | they have a robust_head set. This approach has two fundamental problems | 
|  | 56 | left: | 
|  | 57 |  | 
|  | 58 | - it has quite complex locking and race scenarios. The vma-based | 
|  | 59 | approach had been pending for years, but they are still not completely | 
|  | 60 | reliable. | 
|  | 61 |  | 
|  | 62 | - they have to scan _every_ vma at sys_exit() time, per thread! | 
|  | 63 |  | 
|  | 64 | The second disadvantage is a real killer: pthread_exit() takes around 1 | 
|  | 65 | microsecond on Linux, but with thousands (or tens of thousands) of vmas | 
|  | 66 | every pthread_exit() takes a millisecond or more, also totally | 
|  | 67 | destroying the CPU's L1 and L2 caches! | 
|  | 68 |  | 
|  | 69 | This is very much noticeable even for normal process sys_exit_group() | 
|  | 70 | calls: the kernel has to do the vma scanning unconditionally! (this is | 
|  | 71 | because the kernel has no knowledge about how many robust futexes there | 
|  | 72 | are to be cleaned up, because a robust futex might have been registered | 
|  | 73 | in another task, and the futex variable might have been simply mmap()-ed | 
|  | 74 | into this process's address space). | 
|  | 75 |  | 
|  | 76 | This huge overhead forced the creation of CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST so that | 
|  | 77 | normal kernels can turn it off, but worse than that: the overhead makes | 
|  | 78 | robust futexes impractical for any type of generic Linux distribution. | 
|  | 79 |  | 
|  | 80 | So something had to be done. | 
|  | 81 |  | 
|  | 82 | New approach to robust futexes | 
|  | 83 | ------------------------------ | 
|  | 84 |  | 
|  | 85 | At the heart of this new approach there is a per-thread private list of | 
|  | 86 | robust locks that userspace is holding (maintained by glibc) - which | 
|  | 87 | userspace list is registered with the kernel via a new syscall [this | 
|  | 88 | registration happens at most once per thread lifetime]. At do_exit() | 
|  | 89 | time, the kernel checks this user-space list: are there any robust futex | 
|  | 90 | locks to be cleaned up? | 
|  | 91 |  | 
|  | 92 | In the common case, at do_exit() time, there is no list registered, so | 
|  | 93 | the cost of robust futexes is just a simple current->robust_list != NULL | 
|  | 94 | comparison. If the thread has registered a list, then normally the list | 
|  | 95 | is empty. If the thread/process crashed or terminated in some incorrect | 
|  | 96 | way then the list might be non-empty: in this case the kernel carefully | 
|  | 97 | walks the list [not trusting it], and marks all locks that are owned by | 
| Ingo Molnar | 6abdce7 | 2006-06-27 02:54:48 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 98 | this thread with the FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit, and wakes up one waiter (if | 
| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 99 | any). | 
|  | 100 |  | 
|  | 101 | The list is guaranteed to be private and per-thread at do_exit() time, | 
|  | 102 | so it can be accessed by the kernel in a lockless way. | 
|  | 103 |  | 
|  | 104 | There is one race possible though: since adding to and removing from the | 
|  | 105 | list is done after the futex is acquired by glibc, there is a few | 
|  | 106 | instructions window for the thread (or process) to die there, leaving | 
|  | 107 | the futex hung. To protect against this possibility, userspace (glibc) | 
|  | 108 | also maintains a simple per-thread 'list_op_pending' field, to allow the | 
|  | 109 | kernel to clean up if the thread dies after acquiring the lock, but just | 
|  | 110 | before it could have added itself to the list. Glibc sets this | 
|  | 111 | list_op_pending field before it tries to acquire the futex, and clears | 
|  | 112 | it after the list-add (or list-remove) has finished. | 
|  | 113 |  | 
|  | 114 | That's all that is needed - all the rest of robust-futex cleanup is done | 
|  | 115 | in userspace [just like with the previous patches]. | 
|  | 116 |  | 
|  | 117 | Ulrich Drepper has implemented the necessary glibc support for this new | 
|  | 118 | mechanism, which fully enables robust mutexes. | 
|  | 119 |  | 
|  | 120 | Key differences of this userspace-list based approach, compared to the | 
|  | 121 | vma based method: | 
|  | 122 |  | 
|  | 123 | - it's much, much faster: at thread exit time, there's no need to loop | 
|  | 124 | over every vma (!), which the VM-based method has to do. Only a very | 
|  | 125 | simple 'is the list empty' op is done. | 
|  | 126 |  | 
|  | 127 | - no VM changes are needed - 'struct address_space' is left alone. | 
|  | 128 |  | 
|  | 129 | - no registration of individual locks is needed: robust mutexes dont | 
|  | 130 | need any extra per-lock syscalls. Robust mutexes thus become a very | 
|  | 131 | lightweight primitive - so they dont force the application designer | 
|  | 132 | to do a hard choice between performance and robustness - robust | 
|  | 133 | mutexes are just as fast. | 
|  | 134 |  | 
|  | 135 | - no per-lock kernel allocation happens. | 
|  | 136 |  | 
|  | 137 | - no resource limits are needed. | 
|  | 138 |  | 
|  | 139 | - no kernel-space recovery call (FUTEX_RECOVER) is needed. | 
|  | 140 |  | 
|  | 141 | - the implementation and the locking is "obvious", and there are no | 
|  | 142 | interactions with the VM. | 
|  | 143 |  | 
|  | 144 | Performance | 
|  | 145 | ----------- | 
|  | 146 |  | 
|  | 147 | I have benchmarked the time needed for the kernel to process a list of 1 | 
|  | 148 | million (!) held locks, using the new method [on a 2GHz CPU]: | 
|  | 149 |  | 
|  | 150 | - with FUTEX_WAIT set [contended mutex]: 130 msecs | 
|  | 151 | - without FUTEX_WAIT set [uncontended mutex]: 30 msecs | 
|  | 152 |  | 
|  | 153 | I have also measured an approach where glibc does the lock notification | 
|  | 154 | [which it currently does for !pshared robust mutexes], and that took 256 | 
|  | 155 | msecs - clearly slower, due to the 1 million FUTEX_WAKE syscalls | 
|  | 156 | userspace had to do. | 
|  | 157 |  | 
|  | 158 | (1 million held locks are unheard of - we expect at most a handful of | 
|  | 159 | locks to be held at a time. Nevertheless it's nice to know that this | 
|  | 160 | approach scales nicely.) | 
|  | 161 |  | 
|  | 162 | Implementation details | 
|  | 163 | ---------------------- | 
|  | 164 |  | 
|  | 165 | The patch adds two new syscalls: one to register the userspace list, and | 
|  | 166 | one to query the registered list pointer: | 
|  | 167 |  | 
|  | 168 | asmlinkage long | 
|  | 169 | sys_set_robust_list(struct robust_list_head __user *head, | 
|  | 170 | size_t len); | 
|  | 171 |  | 
|  | 172 | asmlinkage long | 
|  | 173 | sys_get_robust_list(int pid, struct robust_list_head __user **head_ptr, | 
|  | 174 | size_t __user *len_ptr); | 
|  | 175 |  | 
|  | 176 | List registration is very fast: the pointer is simply stored in | 
|  | 177 | current->robust_list. [Note that in the future, if robust futexes become | 
|  | 178 | widespread, we could extend sys_clone() to register a robust-list head | 
|  | 179 | for new threads, without the need of another syscall.] | 
|  | 180 |  | 
|  | 181 | So there is virtually zero overhead for tasks not using robust futexes, | 
|  | 182 | and even for robust futex users, there is only one extra syscall per | 
|  | 183 | thread lifetime, and the cleanup operation, if it happens, is fast and | 
| Matt LaPlante | 5d3f083 | 2006-11-30 05:21:10 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 184 | straightforward. The kernel doesn't have any internal distinction between | 
| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 185 | robust and normal futexes. | 
|  | 186 |  | 
|  | 187 | If a futex is found to be held at exit time, the kernel sets the | 
|  | 188 | following bit of the futex word: | 
|  | 189 |  | 
|  | 190 | #define FUTEX_OWNER_DIED        0x40000000 | 
|  | 191 |  | 
|  | 192 | and wakes up the next futex waiter (if any). User-space does the rest of | 
|  | 193 | the cleanup. | 
|  | 194 |  | 
|  | 195 | Otherwise, robust futexes are acquired by glibc by putting the TID into | 
|  | 196 | the futex field atomically. Waiters set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit: | 
|  | 197 |  | 
|  | 198 | #define FUTEX_WAITERS           0x80000000 | 
|  | 199 |  | 
|  | 200 | and the remaining bits are for the TID. | 
|  | 201 |  | 
|  | 202 | Testing, architecture support | 
|  | 203 | ----------------------------- | 
|  | 204 |  | 
|  | 205 | i've tested the new syscalls on x86 and x86_64, and have made sure the | 
|  | 206 | parsing of the userspace list is robust [ ;-) ] even if the list is | 
|  | 207 | deliberately corrupted. | 
|  | 208 |  | 
|  | 209 | i386 and x86_64 syscalls are wired up at the moment, and Ulrich has | 
|  | 210 | tested the new glibc code (on x86_64 and i386), and it works for his | 
|  | 211 | robust-mutex testcases. | 
|  | 212 |  | 
|  | 213 | All other architectures should build just fine too - but they wont have | 
|  | 214 | the new syscalls yet. | 
|  | 215 |  | 
| Ingo Molnar | 8f17d3a | 2006-03-27 01:16:27 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 216 | Architectures need to implement the new futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() | 
| Ingo Molnar | 2eec9ad | 2006-03-27 01:16:23 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 217 | inline function before writing up the syscalls (that function returns | 
|  | 218 | -ENOSYS right now). |