Haavard Skinnemoen | 5f97f7f | 2006-09-25 23:32:13 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | /* |
| 2 | * AVR32 sempahore implementation. |
| 3 | * |
| 4 | * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Atmel Corporation |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * Based on linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c |
| 7 | * Copyright (C) 1999 Linus Torvalds |
| 8 | * |
| 9 | * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify |
| 10 | * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as |
| 11 | * published by the Free Software Foundation. |
| 12 | */ |
| 13 | |
| 14 | #include <linux/sched.h> |
| 15 | #include <linux/errno.h> |
| 16 | #include <linux/module.h> |
| 17 | |
| 18 | #include <asm/semaphore.h> |
| 19 | #include <asm/atomic.h> |
| 20 | |
| 21 | /* |
| 22 | * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: |
| 23 | * The "count" variable is decremented for each process |
| 24 | * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping" |
| 25 | * variable is a count of such acquires. |
| 26 | * |
| 27 | * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can |
| 28 | * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up |
| 29 | * needs to do something only if count was negative before |
| 30 | * the increment operation. |
| 31 | * |
| 32 | * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected |
| 33 | * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head. |
| 34 | * |
| 35 | * Note that these functions are only called when there is |
| 36 | * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the |
| 37 | * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The |
| 38 | * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h> |
| 39 | * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls. |
| 40 | */ |
| 41 | |
| 42 | /* |
| 43 | * Logic: |
| 44 | * - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go |
| 45 | * from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up. |
| 46 | * - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we |
| 47 | * (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure |
| 48 | * that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that |
| 49 | * we cannot lose wakeup events. |
| 50 | */ |
| 51 | |
| 52 | void __up(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 53 | { |
| 54 | wake_up(&sem->wait); |
| 55 | } |
| 56 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up); |
| 57 | |
| 58 | void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 59 | { |
| 60 | struct task_struct *tsk = current; |
| 61 | DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); |
| 62 | unsigned long flags; |
| 63 | |
| 64 | tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 65 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 66 | add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 67 | |
| 68 | sem->sleepers++; |
| 69 | for (;;) { |
| 70 | int sleepers = sem->sleepers; |
| 71 | |
| 72 | /* |
| 73 | * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't |
| 74 | * playing, because we own the spinlock in |
| 75 | * the wait_queue_head. |
| 76 | */ |
| 77 | if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) { |
| 78 | sem->sleepers = 0; |
| 79 | break; |
| 80 | } |
| 81 | sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ |
| 82 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 83 | |
| 84 | schedule(); |
| 85 | |
| 86 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 87 | tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 88 | } |
| 89 | remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 90 | wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); |
| 91 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 92 | tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; |
| 93 | } |
| 94 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down); |
| 95 | |
| 96 | int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 97 | { |
| 98 | int retval = 0; |
| 99 | struct task_struct *tsk = current; |
| 100 | DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); |
| 101 | unsigned long flags; |
| 102 | |
| 103 | tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 104 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 105 | add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 106 | |
| 107 | sem->sleepers++; |
| 108 | for (;;) { |
| 109 | int sleepers = sem->sleepers; |
| 110 | |
| 111 | /* |
| 112 | * With signals pending, this turns into the trylock |
| 113 | * failure case - we won't be sleeping, and we can't |
| 114 | * get the lock as it has contention. Just correct the |
| 115 | * count and exit. |
| 116 | */ |
| 117 | if (signal_pending(current)) { |
| 118 | retval = -EINTR; |
| 119 | sem->sleepers = 0; |
| 120 | atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count); |
| 121 | break; |
| 122 | } |
| 123 | |
| 124 | /* |
| 125 | * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't |
| 126 | * playing, because we own the spinlock in |
| 127 | * the wait_queue_head. |
| 128 | */ |
| 129 | if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) { |
| 130 | sem->sleepers = 0; |
| 131 | break; |
| 132 | } |
| 133 | sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ |
| 134 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 135 | |
| 136 | schedule(); |
| 137 | |
| 138 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 139 | tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 140 | } |
| 141 | remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 142 | wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); |
| 143 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); |
| 144 | |
| 145 | tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; |
| 146 | return retval; |
| 147 | } |
| 148 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible); |