| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 1 |  | 
 | 2 |                        PCI Error Recovery | 
 | 3 |                        ------------------ | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 4 |                         February 2, 2006 | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 5 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 6 |                  Current document maintainer: | 
 | 7 |              Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com> | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 8 |  | 
 | 9 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 10 | Many PCI bus controllers are able to detect a variety of hardware | 
 | 11 | PCI errors on the bus, such as parity errors on the data and address | 
 | 12 | busses, as well as SERR and PERR errors.  Some of the more advanced | 
 | 13 | chipsets are able to deal with these errors; these include PCI-E chipsets, | 
 | 14 | and the PCI-host bridges found on IBM Power4 and Power5-based pSeries | 
 | 15 | boxes. A typical action taken is to disconnect the affected device, | 
 | 16 | halting all I/O to it.  The goal of a disconnection is to avoid system | 
 | 17 | corruption; for example, to halt system memory corruption due to DMA's | 
 | 18 | to "wild" addresses. Typically, a reconnection mechanism is also | 
 | 19 | offered, so that the affected PCI device(s) are reset and put back | 
 | 20 | into working condition. The reset phase requires coordination | 
 | 21 | between the affected device drivers and the PCI controller chip. | 
 | 22 | This document describes a generic API for notifying device drivers | 
 | 23 | of a bus disconnection, and then performing error recovery. | 
 | 24 | This API is currently implemented in the 2.6.16 and later kernels. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 25 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 26 | Reporting and recovery is performed in several steps. First, when | 
 | 27 | a PCI hardware error has resulted in a bus disconnect, that event | 
 | 28 | is reported as soon as possible to all affected device drivers, | 
 | 29 | including multiple instances of a device driver on multi-function | 
 | 30 | cards. This allows device drivers to avoid deadlocking in spinloops, | 
 | 31 | waiting for some i/o-space register to change, when it never will. | 
 | 32 | It also gives the drivers a chance to defer incoming I/O as | 
 | 33 | needed. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 34 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 35 | Next, recovery is performed in several stages. Most of the complexity | 
 | 36 | is forced by the need to handle multi-function devices, that is, | 
 | 37 | devices that have multiple device drivers associated with them. | 
 | 38 | In the first stage, each driver is allowed to indicate what type | 
 | 39 | of reset it desires, the choices being a simple re-enabling of I/O | 
 | 40 | or requesting a hard reset (a full electrical #RST of the PCI card). | 
 | 41 | If any driver requests a full reset, that is what will be done. | 
 | 42 |  | 
 | 43 | After a full reset and/or a re-enabling of I/O, all drivers are | 
 | 44 | again notified, so that they may then perform any device setup/config | 
 | 45 | that may be required.  After these have all completed, a final | 
 | 46 | "resume normal operations" event is sent out. | 
 | 47 |  | 
 | 48 | The biggest reason for choosing a kernel-based implementation rather | 
 | 49 | than a user-space implementation was the need to deal with bus | 
 | 50 | disconnects of PCI devices attached to storage media, and, in particular, | 
 | 51 | disconnects from devices holding the root file system.  If the root | 
 | 52 | file system is disconnected, a user-space mechanism would have to go | 
 | 53 | through a large number of contortions to complete recovery. Almost all | 
 | 54 | of the current Linux file systems are not tolerant of disconnection | 
 | 55 | from/reconnection to their underlying block device. By contrast, | 
 | 56 | bus errors are easy to manage in the device driver. Indeed, most | 
 | 57 | device drivers already handle very similar recovery procedures; | 
 | 58 | for example, the SCSI-generic layer already provides significant | 
 | 59 | mechanisms for dealing with SCSI bus errors and SCSI bus resets. | 
 | 60 |  | 
 | 61 |  | 
 | 62 | Detailed Design | 
 | 63 | --------------- | 
 | 64 | Design and implementation details below, based on a chain of | 
 | 65 | public email discussions with Ben Herrenschmidt, circa 5 April 2005. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 66 |  | 
 | 67 | The error recovery API support is exposed to the driver in the form of | 
 | 68 | a structure of function pointers pointed to by a new field in struct | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | pci_driver. A driver that fails to provide the structure is "non-aware", | 
 | 70 | and the actual recovery steps taken are platform dependent.  The | 
 | 71 | arch/powerpc implementation will simulate a PCI hotplug remove/add. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 72 |  | 
 | 73 | This structure has the form: | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 74 | struct pci_error_handlers | 
 | 75 | { | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 76 | 	int (*error_detected)(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_channel_state); | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 77 | 	int (*mmio_enabled)(struct pci_dev *dev); | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 78 | 	int (*link_reset)(struct pci_dev *dev); | 
 | 79 | 	int (*slot_reset)(struct pci_dev *dev); | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 80 | 	void (*resume)(struct pci_dev *dev); | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 81 | }; | 
 | 82 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 83 | The possible channel states are: | 
 | 84 | enum pci_channel_state { | 
 | 85 | 	pci_channel_io_normal,  /* I/O channel is in normal state */ | 
 | 86 | 	pci_channel_io_frozen,  /* I/O to channel is blocked */ | 
 | 87 | 	pci_channel_io_perm_failure, /* PCI card is dead */ | 
 | 88 | }; | 
 | 89 |  | 
 | 90 | Possible return values are: | 
 | 91 | enum pci_ers_result { | 
 | 92 | 	PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE,        /* no result/none/not supported in device driver */ | 
 | 93 | 	PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER, /* Device driver can recover without slot reset */ | 
 | 94 | 	PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET,  /* Device driver wants slot to be reset. */ | 
 | 95 | 	PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT,  /* Device has completely failed, is unrecoverable */ | 
 | 96 | 	PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED,   /* Device driver is fully recovered and operational */ | 
 | 97 | }; | 
 | 98 |  | 
 | 99 | A driver does not have to implement all of these callbacks; however, | 
 | 100 | if it implements any, it must implement error_detected(). If a callback | 
 | 101 | is not implemented, the corresponding feature is considered unsupported. | 
 | 102 | For example, if mmio_enabled() and resume() aren't there, then it | 
 | 103 | is assumed that the driver is not doing any direct recovery and requires | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 104 | a reset. If link_reset() is not implemented, the card is assumed as | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 105 | not care about link resets. Typically a driver will want to know about | 
 | 106 | a slot_reset(). | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 107 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 108 | The actual steps taken by a platform to recover from a PCI error | 
 | 109 | event will be platform-dependent, but will follow the general | 
 | 110 | sequence described below. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 111 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 112 | STEP 0: Error Event | 
 | 113 | ------------------- | 
 | 114 | PCI bus error is detect by the PCI hardware.  On powerpc, the slot | 
 | 115 | is isolated, in that all I/O is blocked: all reads return 0xffffffff, | 
 | 116 | all writes are ignored. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 117 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 118 |  | 
 | 119 | STEP 1: Notification | 
 | 120 | -------------------- | 
 | 121 | Platform calls the error_detected() callback on every instance of | 
 | 122 | every driver affected by the error. | 
 | 123 |  | 
 | 124 | At this point, the device might not be accessible anymore, depending on | 
 | 125 | the platform (the slot will be isolated on powerpc). The driver may | 
 | 126 | already have "noticed" the error because of a failing I/O, but this | 
 | 127 | is the proper "synchronization point", that is, it gives the driver | 
 | 128 | a chance to cleanup, waiting for pending stuff (timers, whatever, etc...) | 
 | 129 | to complete; it can take semaphores, schedule, etc... everything but | 
 | 130 | touch the device. Within this function and after it returns, the driver | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 131 | shouldn't do any new IOs. Called in task context. This is sort of a | 
 | 132 | "quiesce" point. See note about interrupts at the end of this doc. | 
 | 133 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 134 | All drivers participating in this system must implement this call. | 
 | 135 | The driver must return one of the following result codes: | 
 | 136 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER: | 
 | 137 | 		  Driver returns this if it thinks it might be able to recover | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 138 | 		  the HW by just banging IOs or if it wants to be given | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 139 | 		  a chance to extract some diagnostic information (see | 
 | 140 | 		  mmio_enable, below). | 
 | 141 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET: | 
 | 142 | 		  Driver returns this if it can't recover without a hard | 
 | 143 | 		  slot reset. | 
 | 144 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT: | 
 | 145 | 		  Driver returns this if it doesn't want to recover at all. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 146 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 147 | The next step taken will depend on the result codes returned by the | 
 | 148 | drivers. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 149 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 150 | If all drivers on the segment/slot return PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER, | 
 | 151 | then the platform should re-enable IOs on the slot (or do nothing in | 
 | 152 | particular, if the platform doesn't isolate slots), and recovery | 
 | 153 | proceeds to STEP 2 (MMIO Enable). | 
 | 154 |  | 
 | 155 | If any driver requested a slot reset (by returning PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET), | 
 | 156 | then recovery proceeds to STEP 4 (Slot Reset). | 
 | 157 |  | 
 | 158 | If the platform is unable to recover the slot, the next step | 
 | 159 | is STEP 6 (Permanent Failure). | 
 | 160 |  | 
 | 161 | >>> The current powerpc implementation assumes that a device driver will | 
 | 162 | >>> *not* schedule or semaphore in this routine; the current powerpc | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 163 | >>> implementation uses one kernel thread to notify all devices; | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 164 | >>> thus, if one device sleeps/schedules, all devices are affected. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 165 | >>> Doing better requires complex multi-threaded logic in the error | 
 | 166 | >>> recovery implementation (e.g. waiting for all notification threads | 
 | 167 | >>> to "join" before proceeding with recovery.)  This seems excessively | 
 | 168 | >>> complex and not worth implementing. | 
 | 169 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 170 | >>> The current powerpc implementation doesn't much care if the device | 
 | 171 | >>> attempts I/O at this point, or not.  I/O's will fail, returning | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 172 | >>> a value of 0xff on read, and writes will be dropped. If the device | 
 | 173 | >>> driver attempts more than 10K I/O's to a frozen adapter, it will | 
 | 174 | >>> assume that the device driver has gone into an infinite loop, and | 
| Paolo Ornati | 670e9f3 | 2006-10-03 22:57:56 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 175 | >>> it will panic the kernel. There doesn't seem to be any other | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | >>> way of stopping a device driver that insists on spinning on I/O. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 177 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 178 | STEP 2: MMIO Enabled | 
 | 179 | ------------------- | 
 | 180 | The platform re-enables MMIO to the device (but typically not the | 
 | 181 | DMA), and then calls the mmio_enabled() callback on all affected | 
 | 182 | device drivers. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 183 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 184 | This is the "early recovery" call. IOs are allowed again, but DMA is | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 185 | not (hrm... to be discussed, I prefer not), with some restrictions. This | 
 | 186 | is NOT a callback for the driver to start operations again, only to | 
 | 187 | peek/poke at the device, extract diagnostic information, if any, and | 
 | 188 | eventually do things like trigger a device local reset or some such, | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 189 | but not restart operations. This is callback is made if all drivers on | 
 | 190 | a segment agree that they can try to recover and if no automatic link reset | 
 | 191 | was performed by the HW. If the platform can't just re-enable IOs without | 
 | 192 | a slot reset or a link reset, it wont call this callback, and instead | 
 | 193 | will have gone directly to STEP 3 (Link Reset) or STEP 4 (Slot Reset) | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 194 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 195 | >>> The following is proposed; no platform implements this yet: | 
 | 196 | >>> Proposal: All I/O's should be done _synchronously_ from within | 
 | 197 | >>> this callback, errors triggered by them will be returned via | 
 | 198 | >>> the normal pci_check_whatever() API, no new error_detected() | 
 | 199 | >>> callback will be issued due to an error happening here. However, | 
 | 200 | >>> such an error might cause IOs to be re-blocked for the whole | 
 | 201 | >>> segment, and thus invalidate the recovery that other devices | 
 | 202 | >>> on the same segment might have done, forcing the whole segment | 
 | 203 | >>> into one of the next states, that is, link reset or slot reset. | 
 | 204 |  | 
 | 205 | The driver should return one of the following result codes: | 
 | 206 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 207 | 		  Driver returns this if it thinks the device is fully | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 208 | 		  functional and thinks it is ready to start | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 209 | 		  normal driver operations again. There is no | 
 | 210 | 		  guarantee that the driver will actually be | 
 | 211 | 		  allowed to proceed, as another driver on the | 
 | 212 | 		  same segment might have failed and thus triggered a | 
 | 213 | 		  slot reset on platforms that support it. | 
 | 214 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 215 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 216 | 		  Driver returns this if it thinks the device is not | 
 | 217 | 		  recoverable in it's current state and it needs a slot | 
 | 218 | 		  reset to proceed. | 
 | 219 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 220 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 221 | 		  Same as above. Total failure, no recovery even after | 
 | 222 | 		  reset driver dead. (To be defined more precisely) | 
 | 223 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 224 | The next step taken depends on the results returned by the drivers. | 
 | 225 | If all drivers returned PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED, then the platform | 
 | 226 | proceeds to either STEP3 (Link Reset) or to STEP 5 (Resume Operations). | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 227 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 228 | If any driver returned PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET, then the platform | 
 | 229 | proceeds to STEP 4 (Slot Reset) | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 230 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | >>> The current powerpc implementation does not implement this callback. | 
 | 232 |  | 
 | 233 |  | 
 | 234 | STEP 3: Link Reset | 
 | 235 | ------------------ | 
 | 236 | The platform resets the link, and then calls the link_reset() callback | 
 | 237 | on all affected device drivers.  This is a PCI-Express specific state | 
 | 238 | and is done whenever a non-fatal error has been detected that can be | 
 | 239 | "solved" by resetting the link. This call informs the driver of the | 
 | 240 | reset and the driver should check to see if the device appears to be | 
 | 241 | in working condition. | 
 | 242 |  | 
 | 243 | The driver is not supposed to restart normal driver I/O operations | 
 | 244 | at this point.  It should limit itself to "probing" the device to | 
 | 245 | check it's recoverability status. If all is right, then the platform | 
 | 246 | will call resume() once all drivers have ack'd link_reset(). | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 247 |  | 
 | 248 | 	Result codes: | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 249 | 		(identical to STEP 3 (MMIO Enabled) | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 250 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 251 | The platform then proceeds to either STEP 4 (Slot Reset) or STEP 5 | 
 | 252 | (Resume Operations). | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 253 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 254 | >>> The current powerpc implementation does not implement this callback. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 255 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 256 |  | 
 | 257 | STEP 4: Slot Reset | 
 | 258 | ------------------ | 
 | 259 | The platform performs a soft or hard reset of the device, and then | 
 | 260 | calls the slot_reset() callback. | 
 | 261 |  | 
 | 262 | A soft reset consists of asserting the adapter #RST line and then | 
 | 263 | restoring the PCI BAR's and PCI configuration header to a state | 
 | 264 | that is equivalent to what it would be after a fresh system | 
 | 265 | power-on followed by power-on BIOS/system firmware initialization. | 
 | 266 | If the platform supports PCI hotplug, then the reset might be | 
 | 267 | performed by toggling the slot electrical power off/on. | 
 | 268 |  | 
 | 269 | It is important for the platform to restore the PCI config space | 
 | 270 | to the "fresh poweron" state, rather than the "last state". After | 
 | 271 | a slot reset, the device driver will almost always use its standard | 
 | 272 | device initialization routines, and an unusual config space setup | 
 | 273 | may result in hung devices, kernel panics, or silent data corruption. | 
 | 274 |  | 
 | 275 | This call gives drivers the chance to re-initialize the hardware | 
 | 276 | (re-download firmware, etc.).  At this point, the driver may assume | 
 | 277 | that he card is in a fresh state and is fully functional. In | 
 | 278 | particular, interrupt generation should work normally. | 
 | 279 |  | 
 | 280 | Drivers should not yet restart normal I/O processing operations | 
 | 281 | at this point.  If all device drivers report success on this | 
 | 282 | callback, the platform will call resume() to complete the sequence, | 
 | 283 | and let the driver restart normal I/O processing. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 284 |  | 
 | 285 | A driver can still return a critical failure for this function if | 
 | 286 | it can't get the device operational after reset.  If the platform | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 287 | previously tried a soft reset, it might now try a hard reset (power | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 288 | cycle) and then call slot_reset() again.  It the device still can't | 
 | 289 | be recovered, there is nothing more that can be done;  the platform | 
 | 290 | will typically report a "permanent failure" in such a case.  The | 
 | 291 | device will be considered "dead" in this case. | 
 | 292 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 293 | Drivers for multi-function cards will need to coordinate among | 
 | 294 | themselves as to which driver instance will perform any "one-shot" | 
 | 295 | or global device initialization. For example, the Symbios sym53cxx2 | 
 | 296 | driver performs device init only from PCI function 0: | 
 | 297 |  | 
 | 298 | +       if (PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn) == 0) | 
 | 299 | +               sym_reset_scsi_bus(np, 0); | 
 | 300 |  | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 301 | 	Result codes: | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 302 | 		- PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 303 | 		Same as above. | 
 | 304 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 305 | Platform proceeds either to STEP 5 (Resume Operations) or STEP 6 (Permanent | 
 | 306 | Failure). | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 307 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 308 | >>> The current powerpc implementation does not currently try a | 
 | 309 | >>> power-cycle reset if the driver returned PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT. | 
 | 310 | >>> However, it probably should. | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 311 |  | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 312 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 313 | STEP 5: Resume Operations | 
 | 314 | ------------------------- | 
 | 315 | The platform will call the resume() callback on all affected device | 
 | 316 | drivers if all drivers on the segment have returned | 
 | 317 | PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED from one of the 3 previous callbacks. | 
 | 318 | The goal of this callback is to tell the driver to restart activity, | 
 | 319 | that everything is back and running. This callback does not return | 
 | 320 | a result code. | 
 | 321 |  | 
 | 322 | At this point, if a new error happens, the platform will restart | 
 | 323 | a new error recovery sequence. | 
 | 324 |  | 
 | 325 | STEP 6: Permanent Failure | 
 | 326 | ------------------------- | 
 | 327 | A "permanent failure" has occurred, and the platform cannot recover | 
 | 328 | the device.  The platform will call error_detected() with a | 
 | 329 | pci_channel_state value of pci_channel_io_perm_failure. | 
 | 330 |  | 
 | 331 | The device driver should, at this point, assume the worst. It should | 
 | 332 | cancel all pending I/O, refuse all new I/O, returning -EIO to | 
 | 333 | higher layers. The device driver should then clean up all of its | 
 | 334 | memory and remove itself from kernel operations, much as it would | 
 | 335 | during system shutdown. | 
 | 336 |  | 
 | 337 | The platform will typically notify the system operator of the | 
 | 338 | permanent failure in some way.  If the device is hotplug-capable, | 
 | 339 | the operator will probably want to remove and replace the device. | 
 | 340 | Note, however, not all failures are truly "permanent". Some are | 
 | 341 | caused by over-heating, some by a poorly seated card. Many | 
 | 342 | PCI error events are caused by software bugs, e.g. DMA's to | 
 | 343 | wild addresses or bogus split transactions due to programming | 
 | 344 | errors. See the discussion in powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt | 
 | 345 | for additional detail on real-life experience of the causes of | 
 | 346 | software errors. | 
 | 347 |  | 
 | 348 |  | 
 | 349 | Conclusion; General Remarks | 
 | 350 | --------------------------- | 
 | 351 | The way those callbacks are called is platform policy. A platform with | 
 | 352 | no slot reset capability may want to just "ignore" drivers that can't | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 353 | recover (disconnect them) and try to let other cards on the same segment | 
 | 354 | recover. Keep in mind that in most real life cases, though, there will | 
 | 355 | be only one driver per segment. | 
 | 356 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 357 | Now, a note about interrupts. If you get an interrupt and your | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 358 | device is dead or has been isolated, there is a problem :) | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 359 | The current policy is to turn this into a platform policy. | 
 | 360 | That is, the recovery API only requires that: | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 361 |  | 
 | 362 |  - There is no guarantee that interrupt delivery can proceed from any | 
 | 363 | device on the segment starting from the error detection and until the | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 364 | resume callback is sent, at which point interrupts are expected to be | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 365 | fully operational. | 
 | 366 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 367 |  - There is no guarantee that interrupt delivery is stopped, that is, | 
 | 368 | a driver that gets an interrupt after detecting an error, or that detects | 
 | 369 | an error within the interrupt handler such that it prevents proper | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 370 | ack'ing of the interrupt (and thus removal of the source) should just | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 371 | return IRQ_NOTHANDLED. It's up to the platform to deal with that | 
 | 372 | condition, typically by masking the IRQ source during the duration of | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 373 | the error handling. It is expected that the platform "knows" which | 
 | 374 | interrupts are routed to error-management capable slots and can deal | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 375 | with temporarily disabling that IRQ number during error processing (this | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 376 | isn't terribly complex). That means some IRQ latency for other devices | 
 | 377 | sharing the interrupt, but there is simply no other way. High end | 
 | 378 | platforms aren't supposed to share interrupts between many devices | 
 | 379 | anyway :) | 
 | 380 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 381 | >>> Implementation details for the powerpc platform are discussed in | 
 | 382 | >>> the file Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt | 
| linas@austin.ibm.com | 065c635 | 2005-12-02 19:16:18 -0600 | [diff] [blame] | 383 |  | 
| Linas Vepstas | c9ab8b6 | 2006-02-03 03:03:45 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 384 | >>> As of this writing, there are six device drivers with patches | 
 | 385 | >>> implementing error recovery. Not all of these patches are in | 
 | 386 | >>> mainline yet. These may be used as "examples": | 
 | 387 | >>> | 
 | 388 | >>> drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 
 | 389 | >>> drivers/scsi/sym53cxx_2 | 
 | 390 | >>> drivers/next/e100.c | 
 | 391 | >>> drivers/net/e1000 | 
 | 392 | >>> drivers/net/ixgb | 
 | 393 | >>> drivers/net/s2io.c | 
 | 394 |  | 
 | 395 | The End | 
 | 396 | ------- |