| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats | 
|  | 2 |  | 
|  | 3 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 8e79e1f | 2010-11-04 14:31:19 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | The rcutree and rcutiny implementations of RCU provide debugfs trace | 
|  | 5 | output that summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for | 
|  | 6 | debugging RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU. | 
|  | 7 | The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats, first | 
|  | 8 | for rcutree and next for rcutiny. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 9 |  | 
|  | 10 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 8e79e1f | 2010-11-04 14:31:19 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 11 | CONFIG_TREE_RCU and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 12 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 13 | These implementations of RCU provides several debugfs files under the | 
|  | 14 | top-level directory "rcu": | 
|  | 15 |  | 
|  | 16 | rcu/rcudata: | 
|  | 17 | Displays fields in struct rcu_data. | 
|  | 18 | rcu/rcudata.csv: | 
|  | 19 | Comma-separated values spreadsheet version of rcudata. | 
|  | 20 | rcu/rcugp: | 
|  | 21 | Displays grace-period counters. | 
|  | 22 | rcu/rcuhier: | 
|  | 23 | Displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy. | 
|  | 24 | rcu/rcu_pending: | 
|  | 25 | Displays counts of the reasons rcu_pending() decided that RCU had | 
|  | 26 | work to do. | 
|  | 27 | rcu/rcutorture: | 
|  | 28 | Displays rcutorture test progress. | 
|  | 29 | rcu/rcuboost: | 
|  | 30 | Displays RCU boosting statistics.  Only present if | 
|  | 31 | CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 32 |  | 
|  | 33 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: | 
|  | 34 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 35 | rcu_sched: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2036d94 | 2012-01-30 17:02:47 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 36 | 0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 37 | 1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 38 | 2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 39 | 3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pgp=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 40 | 4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 41 | 5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 42 | 6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 43 | 7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pgp=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 44 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2036d94 | 2012-01-30 17:02:47 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 45 | 0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 46 | 1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 47 | 2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 48 | 3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 49 | 4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 50 | 5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 51 | 6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
|  | 52 | 7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pgp=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 53 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 54 | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second | 
|  | 55 | for rcu_bh.  Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an | 
|  | 56 | additional section for rcu_preempt.  Each section has one line per CPU, | 
|  | 57 | or eight for this 8-CPU system.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 58 |  | 
|  | 59 | o	The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | 
|  | 60 | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, | 
|  | 61 | but have been online at least once since boot.	There will be | 
|  | 62 | no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be | 
|  | 63 | a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is | 
|  | 64 | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. | 
|  | 65 |  | 
|  | 66 | o	"c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2fa218d | 2011-03-27 21:37:58 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 67 | completed.  Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode may | 
|  | 68 | lag quite a ways behind, for example, CPU 6 under "rcu_sched" | 
|  | 69 | above, which has been offline through not quite 40,000 RCU grace | 
|  | 70 | periods.  It is not unusual to see CPUs lagging by thousands of | 
|  | 71 | grace periods. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 72 |  | 
|  | 73 | o	"g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2fa218d | 2011-03-27 21:37:58 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 74 | started.  Again, offlined CPUs and CPUs in dynticks idle mode | 
|  | 75 | may lag behind.  If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU | 
|  | 76 | has already reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace | 
|  | 77 | period that it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it | 
|  | 78 | owes RCU a quiescent state. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 79 |  | 
|  | 80 | o	"pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state | 
|  | 81 | for the current grace period.  It is possible for "pq" to be | 
|  | 82 | "1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although | 
|  | 83 | the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this | 
|  | 84 | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not | 
|  | 85 | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. | 
|  | 86 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | e4cc1f2 | 2011-06-27 00:17:43 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 87 | o	"pgp" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 88 | state for this CPU corresponds to.  This is important for handling | 
|  | 89 | the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle | 
|  | 90 | quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and | 
|  | 91 | reporting its own quiescent state.  If CPU 1 was the last CPU | 
|  | 92 | for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race | 
|  | 93 | will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for | 
|  | 94 | the next grace period! | 
|  | 95 |  | 
|  | 96 | o	"qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2fa218d | 2011-03-27 21:37:58 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 97 | this CPU.  Offlined CPUs and CPUs in dyntick idle mode might | 
|  | 98 | well have qp=1, which is OK: RCU is still ignoring them. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 99 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 100 | o	"dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
|  | 101 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 23b5c8f | 2010-09-07 10:38:22 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 102 | scheduler or by irq.  This number is even if the CPU is in | 
|  | 103 | dyntick idle mode and odd otherwise.  The number after the first | 
|  | 104 | "/" is the interrupt nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, | 
|  | 105 | or one greater than the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. | 
|  | 106 | The number after the second "/" is the NMI nesting depth. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 107 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 108 | o	"df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
|  | 109 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in | 
|  | 110 | dynticks-idle state. | 
|  | 111 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 112 | o	"of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
|  | 113 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2fa218d | 2011-03-27 21:37:58 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 114 | offline.  In a perfect world, this might never happen, but it | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 115 | turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace | 
|  | 116 | periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time | 
|  | 117 | when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not. | 
|  | 118 | Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a | 
|  | 119 | CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal | 
|  | 120 | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. | 
|  | 121 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 122 | o	"ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on | 
|  | 123 | this CPU.  This is the total number of callbacks, regardless | 
|  | 124 | of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to | 
|  | 125 | start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). | 
|  | 126 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0ac3d13 | 2011-03-28 15:47:07 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 127 | o	"qs" gives an indication of the state of the callback queue | 
|  | 128 | with four characters: | 
|  | 129 |  | 
|  | 130 | "N"	Indicates that there are callbacks queued that are not | 
|  | 131 | ready to be handled by the next grace period, and thus | 
|  | 132 | will be handled by the grace period following the next | 
|  | 133 | one. | 
|  | 134 |  | 
|  | 135 | "R"	Indicates that there are callbacks queued that are | 
|  | 136 | ready to be handled by the next grace period. | 
|  | 137 |  | 
|  | 138 | "W"	Indicates that there are callbacks queued that are | 
|  | 139 | waiting on the current grace period. | 
|  | 140 |  | 
|  | 141 | "D"	Indicates that there are callbacks queued that have | 
|  | 142 | already been handled by a prior grace period, and are | 
|  | 143 | thus waiting to be invoked.  Note that callbacks in | 
|  | 144 | the process of being invoked are not counted here. | 
|  | 145 | Callbacks in the process of being invoked are those | 
|  | 146 | that have been removed from the rcu_data structures | 
|  | 147 | queues by rcu_do_batch(), but which have not yet been | 
|  | 148 | invoked. | 
|  | 149 |  | 
|  | 150 | If there are no callbacks in a given one of the above states, | 
|  | 151 | the corresponding character is replaced by ".". | 
|  | 152 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 153 | o	"kt" is the per-CPU kernel-thread state.  The digit preceding | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 15ba0ba | 2011-04-06 16:01:16 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 154 | the first slash is zero if there is no work pending and 1 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 5ece5ba | 2011-04-22 18:08:51 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 155 | otherwise.  The character between the first pair of slashes is | 
|  | 156 | as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 157 |  | 
|  | 158 | "S"	The kernel thread is stopped, in other words, all | 
|  | 159 | CPUs corresponding to this rcu_node structure are | 
|  | 160 | offline. | 
|  | 161 |  | 
|  | 162 | "R"	The kernel thread is running. | 
|  | 163 |  | 
|  | 164 | "W"	The kernel thread is waiting because there is no work | 
|  | 165 | for it to do. | 
|  | 166 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 15ba0ba | 2011-04-06 16:01:16 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 167 | "O"	The kernel thread is waiting because it has been | 
|  | 168 | forced off of its designated CPU or because its | 
|  | 169 | ->cpus_allowed mask permits it to run on other than | 
|  | 170 | its designated CPU. | 
|  | 171 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 172 | "Y"	The kernel thread is yielding to avoid hogging CPU. | 
|  | 173 |  | 
|  | 174 | "?"	Unknown value, indicates a bug. | 
|  | 175 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 15ba0ba | 2011-04-06 16:01:16 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | The number after the final slash is the CPU that the kthread | 
|  | 177 | is actually running on. | 
|  | 178 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d5988af | 2011-06-15 23:07:55 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 179 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernels. | 
|  | 180 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 5ece5ba | 2011-04-22 18:08:51 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 181 | o	"ktl" is the low-order 16 bits (in hexadecimal) of the count of | 
|  | 182 | the number of times that this CPU's per-CPU kthread has gone | 
|  | 183 | through its loop servicing invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread() requests. | 
|  | 184 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d5988af | 2011-06-15 23:07:55 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 185 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernels. | 
|  | 186 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 187 | o	"b" is the batch limit for this CPU.  If more than this number | 
|  | 188 | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | 
|  | 189 | be deferred. | 
|  | 190 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 191 | o	"ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for | 
|  | 192 | this CPU.  Note that ci+ql is the number of callbacks that have | 
|  | 193 | been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity. | 
|  | 194 |  | 
|  | 195 | o	"co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2d999e0 | 2010-10-20 12:06:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 196 | this CPU going offline.  These orphaned callbacks have been moved | 
|  | 197 | to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 198 |  | 
|  | 199 | o	"ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to | 
|  | 200 | other CPUs going offline.  Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of | 
|  | 201 | RCU callbacks registered on this CPU. | 
|  | 202 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 203 | There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in | 
|  | 204 | comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format. | 
|  | 205 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 206 |  | 
|  | 207 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | 
|  | 208 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 209 | rcu_sched: completed=33062  gpnum=33063 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 210 | rcu_bh: completed=464  gpnum=464 | 
|  | 211 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 212 | Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh".  Note that | 
|  | 213 | kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional | 
|  | 214 | "rcu_preempt" line.  The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, | 
|  | 215 | and are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 216 |  | 
|  | 217 | o	"completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | 
|  | 218 | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a | 
|  | 219 | CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware | 
|  | 220 | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. | 
|  | 221 |  | 
|  | 222 | o	"gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started.  It is | 
|  | 223 | comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU | 
|  | 224 | whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the | 
|  | 225 | corresponding RCU grace period has started. | 
|  | 226 |  | 
|  | 227 | If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), | 
|  | 228 | then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU | 
|  | 229 | is idle.  On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 230 | do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 231 |  | 
|  | 232 |  | 
|  | 233 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: | 
|  | 234 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2d999e0 | 2010-10-20 12:06:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 235 | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 12f5f52 | 2010-11-29 21:56:39 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 236 | 1/1 ..>. 0:127 ^0 | 
|  | 237 | 3/3 ..>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 ..>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 ..>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 ..>. 108:127 ^3 | 
|  | 238 | 3/3f ..>. 0:5 ^0    2/3 ..>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 ..>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 ..>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 ..>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 ..>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 ..>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 ..>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 ..>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 ..>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 ..>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 ..>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 ..>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 ..>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 ..>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 ..>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 ..>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 ..>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 ..>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 ..>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 ..>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 ..>. 126:127 ^3 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 239 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 2d999e0 | 2010-10-20 12:06:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 240 | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 12f5f52 | 2010-11-29 21:56:39 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 241 | 0/1 ..>. 0:127 ^0 | 
|  | 242 | 0/3 ..>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 ..>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 ..>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 ..>. 108:127 ^3 | 
|  | 243 | 0/3f ..>. 0:5 ^0    0/3 ..>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 ..>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 ..>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 ..>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 ..>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 ..>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 ..>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 ..>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 ..>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 ..>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 ..>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 ..>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 ..>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 ..>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 ..>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 ..>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 ..>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 ..>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 ..>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 ..>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 ..>. 126:127 ^3 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 244 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 245 | This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, | 
|  | 246 | and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional | 
|  | 247 | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 248 |  | 
|  | 249 | o	"c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. | 
|  | 250 |  | 
|  | 251 | o	"g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. | 
|  | 252 |  | 
|  | 253 | o	"s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s | 
|  | 254 | state machine. | 
|  | 255 |  | 
|  | 256 | o	"jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period | 
|  | 257 | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 258 | along.  Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode throughout the grace | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 259 | period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by | 
|  | 260 | some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). | 
|  | 261 |  | 
|  | 262 | o	"j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. | 
|  | 263 | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to | 
|  | 264 | be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting.  Why do you ask? | 
|  | 265 |  | 
|  | 266 | o	"nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since | 
|  | 267 | boot. | 
|  | 268 |  | 
|  | 269 | o	"nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), | 
|  | 270 | where there wasn't actually a grace period active.  This can | 
|  | 271 | happen due to races.  The number in parentheses is the difference | 
|  | 272 | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that | 
|  | 273 | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. | 
|  | 274 |  | 
|  | 275 | o	"fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that | 
|  | 276 | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) | 
|  | 277 | due to contention on ->fqslock. | 
|  | 278 |  | 
|  | 279 | o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | 
|  | 280 | rcu_node.  Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from | 
|  | 281 | root to leaves.  It is best to think of the rcu_data structures | 
|  | 282 | as forming yet another level after the leaves.  Note that there | 
|  | 283 | might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, | 
|  | 284 | depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and | 
|  | 285 | CONFIG_NR_CPUS. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 286 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 287 | o	The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed | 
|  | 288 | by the qsmaskinit.  The qsmask will have one bit | 
|  | 289 | set for each entity in the next lower level that | 
|  | 290 | has not yet checked in for the current grace period. | 
|  | 291 | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is | 
|  | 292 | currently expected to check in during each grace period. | 
|  | 293 | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask | 
|  | 294 | at the beginning of each grace period. | 
|  | 295 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 296 | For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first | 
|  | 297 | entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we | 
|  | 298 | are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the | 
|  | 299 | current grace period. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 300 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 301 | o	The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 12f5f52 | 2010-11-29 21:56:39 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 302 | of the blocked-tasks lists.  A "G" preceding the ">" | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 303 | indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU | 
|  | 304 | read-side critical section blocks the current grace | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 12f5f52 | 2010-11-29 21:56:39 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 305 | period, while a "E" preceding the ">" indicates that | 
|  | 306 | at least one task blocked in an RCU read-side critical | 
|  | 307 | section blocks the current expedited grace period. | 
|  | 308 | A "T" character following the ">" indicates that at | 
|  | 309 | least one task is blocked within an RCU read-side | 
|  | 310 | critical section, regardless of whether any current | 
|  | 311 | grace period (expedited or normal) is inconvenienced. | 
|  | 312 | A "." character appears if the corresponding condition | 
|  | 313 | does not hold, so that "..>." indicates that no tasks | 
|  | 314 | are blocked.  In contrast, "GE>T" indicates maximal | 
|  | 315 | inconvenience from blocked tasks. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 316 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 317 | o	The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs | 
|  | 318 | served by this struct rcu_node.  This can be helpful | 
|  | 319 | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. | 
|  | 320 |  | 
|  | 321 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
|  | 322 | "0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. | 
|  | 323 |  | 
|  | 324 | o	The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the | 
|  | 325 | next higher level rcu_node structure that this | 
|  | 326 | rcu_node structure corresponds to. | 
|  | 327 |  | 
|  | 328 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
|  | 329 | "^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in | 
|  | 330 | the first entry at the middle level. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 331 |  | 
|  | 332 |  | 
|  | 333 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: | 
|  | 334 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 335 | rcu_sched: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 4605c01 | 2012-06-26 14:00:48 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 336 | 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nn=146741 | 
|  | 337 | 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nn=155792 | 
|  | 338 | 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nn=136629 | 
|  | 339 | 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nn=137723 | 
|  | 340 | 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nn=123110 | 
|  | 341 | 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nn=137456 | 
|  | 342 | 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nn=120834 | 
|  | 343 | 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nn=144888 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 344 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 4605c01 | 2012-06-26 14:00:48 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 345 | 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nn=145314 | 
|  | 346 | 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nn=143180 | 
|  | 347 | 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nn=117936 | 
|  | 348 | 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nn=134863 | 
|  | 349 | 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nn=110671 | 
|  | 350 | 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nn=133235 | 
|  | 351 | 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nn=110921 | 
|  | 352 | 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nn=118542 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 353 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 354 | As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" | 
|  | 355 | portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional | 
|  | 356 | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 357 |  | 
|  | 358 | o	"np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked | 
|  | 359 | for the corresponding flavor of RCU. | 
|  | 360 |  | 
|  | 361 | o	"qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a | 
|  | 362 | quiescent state from this CPU. | 
|  | 363 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 364 | o	"rpq" is the number of times that the CPU had passed through | 
|  | 365 | a quiescent state, but not yet reported it to RCU. | 
|  | 366 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 367 | o	"cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks | 
|  | 368 | that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready | 
|  | 369 | to be invoked. | 
|  | 370 |  | 
|  | 371 | o	"cng" is the number of times that this CPU needed another | 
|  | 372 | grace period while RCU was idle. | 
|  | 373 |  | 
|  | 374 | o	"gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had | 
|  | 375 | completed, but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
|  | 376 |  | 
|  | 377 | o	"gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, | 
|  | 378 | but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
|  | 379 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 380 | o	"nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.  Alert | 
|  | 381 | readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very | 
|  | 382 | closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU.  This | 
|  | 383 | is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending(). | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 8e79e1f | 2010-11-04 14:31:19 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 384 |  | 
|  | 385 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 386 | The output of "cat rcu/rcutorture" looks as follows: | 
|  | 387 |  | 
|  | 388 | rcutorture test sequence: 0 (test in progress) | 
|  | 389 | rcutorture update version number: 615 | 
|  | 390 |  | 
|  | 391 | The first line shows the number of rcutorture tests that have completed | 
|  | 392 | since boot.  If a test is currently running, the "(test in progress)" | 
|  | 393 | string will appear as shown above.  The second line shows the number of | 
|  | 394 | update cycles that the current test has started, or zero if there is | 
|  | 395 | no test in progress. | 
|  | 396 |  | 
|  | 397 |  | 
|  | 398 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuboost" looks as follows: | 
|  | 399 |  | 
|  | 400 | 0:5 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=2f95 bt=300f | 
|  | 401 | balk: nt=0 egt=989 bt=0 nb=0 ny=0 nos=16 | 
|  | 402 | 6:7 tasks=.... kt=W ntb=0 neb=0 nnb=0 j=2f95 bt=300f | 
|  | 403 | balk: nt=0 egt=225 bt=0 nb=0 ny=0 nos=6 | 
|  | 404 |  | 
|  | 405 | This information is output only for rcu_preempt.  Each two-line entry | 
|  | 406 | corresponds to a leaf rcu_node strcuture.  The fields are as follows: | 
|  | 407 |  | 
|  | 408 | o	"n:m" is the CPU-number range for the corresponding two-line | 
|  | 409 | entry.  In the sample output above, the first entry covers | 
|  | 410 | CPUs zero through five and the second entry covers CPUs 6 | 
|  | 411 | and 7. | 
|  | 412 |  | 
|  | 413 | o	"tasks=TNEB" gives the state of the various segments of the | 
|  | 414 | rnp->blocked_tasks list: | 
|  | 415 |  | 
|  | 416 | "T"	This indicates that there are some tasks that blocked | 
|  | 417 | while running on one of the corresponding CPUs while | 
|  | 418 | in an RCU read-side critical section. | 
|  | 419 |  | 
|  | 420 | "N"	This indicates that some of the blocked tasks are preventing | 
|  | 421 | the current normal (non-expedited) grace period from | 
|  | 422 | completing. | 
|  | 423 |  | 
|  | 424 | "E"	This indicates that some of the blocked tasks are preventing | 
|  | 425 | the current expedited grace period from completing. | 
|  | 426 |  | 
|  | 427 | "B"	This indicates that some of the blocked tasks are in | 
|  | 428 | need of RCU priority boosting. | 
|  | 429 |  | 
|  | 430 | Each character is replaced with "." if the corresponding | 
|  | 431 | condition does not hold. | 
|  | 432 |  | 
|  | 433 | o	"kt" is the state of the RCU priority-boosting kernel | 
|  | 434 | thread associated with the corresponding rcu_node structure. | 
|  | 435 | The state can be one of the following: | 
|  | 436 |  | 
|  | 437 | "S"	The kernel thread is stopped, in other words, all | 
|  | 438 | CPUs corresponding to this rcu_node structure are | 
|  | 439 | offline. | 
|  | 440 |  | 
|  | 441 | "R"	The kernel thread is running. | 
|  | 442 |  | 
|  | 443 | "W"	The kernel thread is waiting because there is no work | 
|  | 444 | for it to do. | 
|  | 445 |  | 
|  | 446 | "Y"	The kernel thread is yielding to avoid hogging CPU. | 
|  | 447 |  | 
|  | 448 | "?"	Unknown value, indicates a bug. | 
|  | 449 |  | 
|  | 450 | o	"ntb" is the number of tasks boosted. | 
|  | 451 |  | 
|  | 452 | o	"neb" is the number of tasks boosted in order to complete an | 
|  | 453 | expedited grace period. | 
|  | 454 |  | 
|  | 455 | o	"nnb" is the number of tasks boosted in order to complete a | 
|  | 456 | normal (non-expedited) grace period.  When boosting a task | 
|  | 457 | that was blocking both an expedited and a normal grace period, | 
|  | 458 | it is counted against the expedited total above. | 
|  | 459 |  | 
|  | 460 | o	"j" is the low-order 16 bits of the jiffies counter in | 
|  | 461 | hexadecimal. | 
|  | 462 |  | 
|  | 463 | o	"bt" is the low-order 16 bits of the value that the jiffies | 
|  | 464 | counter will have when we next start boosting, assuming that | 
|  | 465 | the current grace period does not end beforehand.  This is | 
|  | 466 | also in hexadecimal. | 
|  | 467 |  | 
|  | 468 | o	"balk: nt" counts the number of times we didn't boost (in | 
|  | 469 | other words, we balked) even though it was time to boost because | 
|  | 470 | there were no blocked tasks to boost.  This situation occurs | 
|  | 471 | when there is one blocked task on one rcu_node structure and | 
|  | 472 | none on some other rcu_node structure. | 
|  | 473 |  | 
|  | 474 | o	"egt" counts the number of times we balked because although | 
|  | 475 | there were blocked tasks, none of them were blocking the | 
|  | 476 | current grace period, whether expedited or otherwise. | 
|  | 477 |  | 
|  | 478 | o	"bt" counts the number of times we balked because boosting | 
|  | 479 | had already been initiated for the current grace period. | 
|  | 480 |  | 
|  | 481 | o	"nb" counts the number of times we balked because there | 
|  | 482 | was at least one task blocking the current non-expedited grace | 
|  | 483 | period that never had blocked.  If it is already running, it | 
|  | 484 | just won't help to boost its priority! | 
|  | 485 |  | 
|  | 486 | o	"ny" counts the number of times we balked because it was | 
|  | 487 | not yet time to start boosting. | 
|  | 488 |  | 
|  | 489 | o	"nos" counts the number of times we balked for other | 
|  | 490 | reasons, e.g., the grace period ended first. | 
|  | 491 |  | 
|  | 492 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 8e79e1f | 2010-11-04 14:31:19 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 493 | CONFIG_TINY_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats | 
|  | 494 |  | 
|  | 495 | These implementations of RCU provides a single debugfs file under the | 
|  | 496 | top-level directory RCU, namely rcu/rcudata, which displays fields in | 
|  | 497 | rcu_bh_ctrlblk, rcu_sched_ctrlblk and, for CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, | 
|  | 498 | rcu_preempt_ctrlblk. | 
|  | 499 |  | 
|  | 500 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" is as follows: | 
|  | 501 |  | 
|  | 502 | rcu_preempt: qlen=24 gp=1097669 g197/p197/c197 tasks=... | 
|  | 503 | ttb=. btg=no ntb=184 neb=0 nnb=183 j=01f7 bt=0274 | 
|  | 504 | normal balk: nt=1097669 gt=0 bt=371 b=0 ny=25073378 nos=0 | 
|  | 505 | exp balk: bt=0 nos=0 | 
|  | 506 | rcu_sched: qlen: 0 | 
|  | 507 | rcu_bh: qlen: 0 | 
|  | 508 |  | 
|  | 509 | This is split into rcu_preempt, rcu_sched, and rcu_bh sections, with the | 
|  | 510 | rcu_preempt section appearing only in CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU builds. | 
|  | 511 | The last three lines of the rcu_preempt section appear only in | 
|  | 512 | CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernel builds.  The fields are as follows: | 
|  | 513 |  | 
|  | 514 | o	"qlen" is the number of RCU callbacks currently waiting either | 
|  | 515 | for an RCU grace period or waiting to be invoked.  This is the | 
|  | 516 | only field present for rcu_sched and rcu_bh, due to the | 
|  | 517 | short-circuiting of grace period in those two cases. | 
|  | 518 |  | 
|  | 519 | o	"gp" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | 
|  | 520 |  | 
|  | 521 | o	"g197/p197/c197" displays the grace-period state, with the | 
|  | 522 | "g" number being the number of grace periods that have started | 
|  | 523 | (mod 256), the "p" number being the number of grace periods | 
|  | 524 | that the CPU has responded to (also mod 256), and the "c" | 
|  | 525 | number being the number of grace periods that have completed | 
|  | 526 | (once again mode 256). | 
|  | 527 |  | 
|  | 528 | Why have both "gp" and "g"?  Because the data flowing into | 
|  | 529 | "gp" is only present in a CONFIG_RCU_TRACE kernel. | 
|  | 530 |  | 
|  | 531 | o	"tasks" is a set of bits.  The first bit is "T" if there are | 
|  | 532 | currently tasks that have recently blocked within an RCU | 
|  | 533 | read-side critical section, the second bit is "N" if any of the | 
|  | 534 | aforementioned tasks are blocking the current RCU grace period, | 
|  | 535 | and the third bit is "E" if any of the aforementioned tasks are | 
|  | 536 | blocking the current expedited grace period.  Each bit is "." | 
|  | 537 | if the corresponding condition does not hold. | 
|  | 538 |  | 
|  | 539 | o	"ttb" is a single bit.  It is "B" if any of the blocked tasks | 
|  | 540 | need to be priority boosted and "." otherwise. | 
|  | 541 |  | 
|  | 542 | o	"btg" indicates whether boosting has been carried out during | 
|  | 543 | the current grace period, with "exp" indicating that boosting | 
|  | 544 | is in progress for an expedited grace period, "no" indicating | 
|  | 545 | that boosting has not yet started for a normal grace period, | 
|  | 546 | "begun" indicating that boosting has bebug for a normal grace | 
|  | 547 | period, and "done" indicating that boosting has completed for | 
|  | 548 | a normal grace period. | 
|  | 549 |  | 
|  | 550 | o	"ntb" is the total number of tasks subjected to RCU priority boosting | 
|  | 551 | periods since boot. | 
|  | 552 |  | 
|  | 553 | o	"neb" is the number of expedited grace periods that have had | 
|  | 554 | to resort to RCU priority boosting since boot. | 
|  | 555 |  | 
|  | 556 | o	"nnb" is the number of normal grace periods that have had | 
|  | 557 | to resort to RCU priority boosting since boot. | 
|  | 558 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 559 | o	"j" is the low-order 16 bits of the jiffies counter in hexadecimal. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 8e79e1f | 2010-11-04 14:31:19 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 560 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 90e6ac3 | 2011-04-06 15:20:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 561 | o	"bt" is the low-order 16 bits of the value that the jiffies counter | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 8e79e1f | 2010-11-04 14:31:19 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 562 | will have at the next time that boosting is scheduled to begin. | 
|  | 563 |  | 
|  | 564 | o	In the line beginning with "normal balk", the fields are as follows: | 
|  | 565 |  | 
|  | 566 | o	"nt" is the number of times that the system balked from | 
|  | 567 | boosting because there were no blocked tasks to boost. | 
|  | 568 | Note that the system will balk from boosting even if the | 
|  | 569 | grace period is overdue when the currently running task | 
|  | 570 | is looping within an RCU read-side critical section. | 
|  | 571 | There is no point in boosting in this case, because | 
|  | 572 | boosting a running task won't make it run any faster. | 
|  | 573 |  | 
|  | 574 | o	"gt" is the number of times that the system balked | 
|  | 575 | from boosting because, although there were blocked tasks, | 
|  | 576 | none of them were preventing the current grace period | 
|  | 577 | from completing. | 
|  | 578 |  | 
|  | 579 | o	"bt" is the number of times that the system balked | 
|  | 580 | from boosting because boosting was already in progress. | 
|  | 581 |  | 
|  | 582 | o	"b" is the number of times that the system balked from | 
|  | 583 | boosting because boosting had already completed for | 
|  | 584 | the grace period in question. | 
|  | 585 |  | 
|  | 586 | o	"ny" is the number of times that the system balked from | 
|  | 587 | boosting because it was not yet time to start boosting | 
|  | 588 | the grace period in question. | 
|  | 589 |  | 
|  | 590 | o	"nos" is the number of times that the system balked from | 
|  | 591 | boosting for inexplicable ("not otherwise specified") | 
|  | 592 | reasons.  This can actually happen due to races involving | 
|  | 593 | increments of the jiffies counter. | 
|  | 594 |  | 
|  | 595 | o	In the line beginning with "exp balk", the fields are as follows: | 
|  | 596 |  | 
|  | 597 | o	"bt" is the number of times that the system balked from | 
|  | 598 | boosting because there were no blocked tasks to boost. | 
|  | 599 |  | 
|  | 600 | o	"nos" is the number of times that the system balked from | 
|  | 601 | boosting for inexplicable ("not otherwise specified") | 
|  | 602 | reasons. |