| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats | 
|  | 2 |  | 
|  | 3 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | The rcutree implementation of RCU provides debugfs trace output that | 
|  | 5 | summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for debugging | 
|  | 6 | RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU. | 
|  | 7 | The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 8 |  | 
|  | 9 |  | 
|  | 10 | Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats | 
|  | 11 |  | 
|  | 12 | This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the | 
|  | 13 | top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcudata (which displays fields in struct | 
|  | 14 | rcu_data), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters), and | 
|  | 15 | rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy). | 
|  | 16 |  | 
|  | 17 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: | 
|  | 18 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 19 | rcu_sched: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 20 | 0 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=1101 of=0 ri=36 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 21 | 1 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=1015 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 22 | 2 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=1839 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 23 | 3 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=1545 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 24 | 4 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=1992 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 25 | 5 c=17829 g=17830 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=3331 of=0 ri=4 ql=2 b=10 | 
|  | 26 | 6 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=3224 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 27 | 7 c=17829 g=17830 pq=0 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=1818 of=0 ri=0 ql=2 b=10 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 28 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 29 | 0 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=0 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 30 | 1 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=13 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 31 | 2 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 32 | 3 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=9 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 33 | 4 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 34 | 5 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 35 | 6 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 36 | 7 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 37 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second | 
|  | 39 | for rcu_bh.  Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an | 
|  | 40 | additional section for rcu_preempt.  Each section has one line per CPU, | 
|  | 41 | or eight for this 8-CPU system.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 42 |  | 
|  | 43 | o	The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | 
|  | 44 | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, | 
|  | 45 | but have been online at least once since boot.	There will be | 
|  | 46 | no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be | 
|  | 47 | a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is | 
|  | 48 | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. | 
|  | 49 |  | 
|  | 50 | o	"c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
|  | 51 | completed.  CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag quite a ways | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu_sched" above, which has | 
|  | 53 | slept through the past 25 RCU grace periods.  It is not unusual | 
|  | 54 | to see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 55 |  | 
|  | 56 | o	"g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
|  | 57 | started.  Again, CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag behind. | 
|  | 58 | If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU has already | 
|  | 59 | reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace period that | 
|  | 60 | it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it owes RCU a | 
|  | 61 | quiescent state. | 
|  | 62 |  | 
|  | 63 | o	"pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state | 
|  | 64 | for the current grace period.  It is possible for "pq" to be | 
|  | 65 | "1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although | 
|  | 66 | the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this | 
|  | 67 | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not | 
|  | 68 | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. | 
|  | 69 |  | 
|  | 70 | o	"pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent | 
|  | 71 | state for this CPU corresponds to.  This is important for handling | 
|  | 72 | the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle | 
|  | 73 | quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and | 
|  | 74 | reporting its own quiescent state.  If CPU 1 was the last CPU | 
|  | 75 | for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race | 
|  | 76 | will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for | 
|  | 77 | the next grace period! | 
|  | 78 |  | 
|  | 79 | o	"qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from | 
|  | 80 | this CPU. | 
|  | 81 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 82 | o	"dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
|  | 83 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the | 
|  | 84 | scheduler or by irq.  The number after the "/" is the interrupt | 
|  | 85 | nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, or one greater than | 
|  | 86 | the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. | 
|  | 87 |  | 
|  | 88 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
|  | 89 |  | 
|  | 90 | o	"dn" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
|  | 91 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state via NMI.  If both | 
|  | 92 | the "dt" and "dn" values are even, then this CPU is in dynticks | 
|  | 93 | idle mode and may be ignored by RCU.  If either of these two | 
|  | 94 | counters is odd, then RCU must be alert to the possibility of | 
|  | 95 | an RCU read-side critical section running on this CPU. | 
|  | 96 |  | 
|  | 97 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
|  | 98 |  | 
|  | 99 | o	"df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
|  | 100 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in | 
|  | 101 | dynticks-idle state. | 
|  | 102 |  | 
|  | 103 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
|  | 104 |  | 
|  | 105 | o	"of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
|  | 106 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being | 
|  | 107 | offline.  In a perfect world, this might neve happen, but it | 
|  | 108 | turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace | 
|  | 109 | periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time | 
|  | 110 | when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not. | 
|  | 111 | Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a | 
|  | 112 | CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal | 
|  | 113 | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. | 
|  | 114 |  | 
|  | 115 | o	"ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a | 
|  | 116 | reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a | 
|  | 117 | quiescent state. | 
|  | 118 |  | 
|  | 119 | o	"ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on | 
|  | 120 | this CPU.  This is the total number of callbacks, regardless | 
|  | 121 | of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to | 
|  | 122 | start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). | 
|  | 123 |  | 
|  | 124 | o	"b" is the batch limit for this CPU.  If more than this number | 
|  | 125 | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | 
|  | 126 | be deferred. | 
|  | 127 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 128 | There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in | 
|  | 129 | comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format. | 
|  | 130 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 131 |  | 
|  | 132 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | 
|  | 133 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 134 | rcu_sched: completed=33062  gpnum=33063 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 135 | rcu_bh: completed=464  gpnum=464 | 
|  | 136 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 137 | Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh".  Note that | 
|  | 138 | kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional | 
|  | 139 | "rcu_preempt" line.  The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, | 
|  | 140 | and are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 141 |  | 
|  | 142 | o	"completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | 
|  | 143 | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a | 
|  | 144 | CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware | 
|  | 145 | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. | 
|  | 146 |  | 
|  | 147 | o	"gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started.  It is | 
|  | 148 | comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU | 
|  | 149 | whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the | 
|  | 150 | corresponding RCU grace period has started. | 
|  | 151 |  | 
|  | 152 | If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), | 
|  | 153 | then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU | 
|  | 154 | is idle.  On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 155 | do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 156 |  | 
|  | 157 |  | 
|  | 158 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: | 
|  | 159 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 160 | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 161 | 1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0 | 
|  | 162 | 3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3 | 
|  | 163 | 3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 164 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 165 | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 166 | 0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0 | 
|  | 167 | 0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3 | 
|  | 168 | 0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 169 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 170 | This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, | 
|  | 171 | and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional | 
|  | 172 | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 173 |  | 
|  | 174 | o	"c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. | 
|  | 175 |  | 
|  | 176 | o	"g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. | 
|  | 177 |  | 
|  | 178 | o	"s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s | 
|  | 179 | state machine. | 
|  | 180 |  | 
|  | 181 | o	"jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period | 
|  | 182 | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things | 
|  | 183 | along.  Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode thoughout the grace | 
|  | 184 | period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by | 
|  | 185 | some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). | 
|  | 186 |  | 
|  | 187 | o	"j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. | 
|  | 188 | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to | 
|  | 189 | be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting.  Why do you ask? | 
|  | 190 |  | 
|  | 191 | o	"nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since | 
|  | 192 | boot. | 
|  | 193 |  | 
|  | 194 | o	"nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), | 
|  | 195 | where there wasn't actually a grace period active.  This can | 
|  | 196 | happen due to races.  The number in parentheses is the difference | 
|  | 197 | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that | 
|  | 198 | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. | 
|  | 199 |  | 
|  | 200 | o	"fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that | 
|  | 201 | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) | 
|  | 202 | due to contention on ->fqslock. | 
|  | 203 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 204 | o	"oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback | 
|  | 205 | list.  RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going | 
|  | 206 | offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing | 
|  | 207 | CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first. | 
|  | 208 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 209 | o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | 
|  | 210 | rcu_node.  Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from | 
|  | 211 | root to leaves.  It is best to think of the rcu_data structures | 
|  | 212 | as forming yet another level after the leaves.  Note that there | 
|  | 213 | might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, | 
|  | 214 | depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and | 
|  | 215 | CONFIG_NR_CPUS. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 216 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 217 | o	The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed | 
|  | 218 | by the qsmaskinit.  The qsmask will have one bit | 
|  | 219 | set for each entity in the next lower level that | 
|  | 220 | has not yet checked in for the current grace period. | 
|  | 221 | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is | 
|  | 222 | currently expected to check in during each grace period. | 
|  | 223 | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask | 
|  | 224 | at the beginning of each grace period. | 
|  | 225 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 226 | For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first | 
|  | 227 | entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we | 
|  | 228 | are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the | 
|  | 229 | current grace period. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 230 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | o	The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state | 
|  | 232 | of the blocked-tasks lists.  A "T" preceding the ">" | 
|  | 233 | indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU | 
|  | 234 | read-side critical section blocks the current grace | 
|  | 235 | period, while a "." preceding the ">" indicates otherwise. | 
|  | 236 | The character following the ">" indicates similarly for | 
|  | 237 | the next grace period.  A "T" should appear in this | 
|  | 238 | field only for rcu-preempt. | 
|  | 239 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 240 | o	The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs | 
|  | 241 | served by this struct rcu_node.  This can be helpful | 
|  | 242 | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. | 
|  | 243 |  | 
|  | 244 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
|  | 245 | "0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. | 
|  | 246 |  | 
|  | 247 | o	The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the | 
|  | 248 | next higher level rcu_node structure that this | 
|  | 249 | rcu_node structure corresponds to. | 
|  | 250 |  | 
|  | 251 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
|  | 252 | "^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in | 
|  | 253 | the first entry at the middle level. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 254 |  | 
|  | 255 |  | 
|  | 256 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: | 
|  | 257 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 258 | rcu_sched: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 259 | 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741 | 
|  | 260 | 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792 | 
|  | 261 | 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629 | 
|  | 262 | 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723 | 
|  | 263 | 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110 | 
|  | 264 | 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456 | 
|  | 265 | 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834 | 
|  | 266 | 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888 | 
|  | 267 | rcu_bh: | 
|  | 268 | 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314 | 
|  | 269 | 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180 | 
|  | 270 | 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936 | 
|  | 271 | 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863 | 
|  | 272 | 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671 | 
|  | 273 | 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235 | 
|  | 274 | 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921 | 
|  | 275 | 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542 | 
|  | 276 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 277 | As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" | 
|  | 278 | portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional | 
|  | 279 | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 280 |  | 
|  | 281 | o	"np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked | 
|  | 282 | for the corresponding flavor of RCU. | 
|  | 283 |  | 
|  | 284 | o	"qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a | 
|  | 285 | quiescent state from this CPU. | 
|  | 286 |  | 
|  | 287 | o	"cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks | 
|  | 288 | that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready | 
|  | 289 | to be invoked. | 
|  | 290 |  | 
|  | 291 | o	"cng" is the number of times that this CPU needed another | 
|  | 292 | grace period while RCU was idle. | 
|  | 293 |  | 
|  | 294 | o	"gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had | 
|  | 295 | completed, but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
|  | 296 |  | 
|  | 297 | o	"gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, | 
|  | 298 | but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
|  | 299 |  | 
|  | 300 | o	"nf" is the number of times that this CPU suspected that the | 
|  | 301 | current grace period had run for too long, and thus needed to | 
|  | 302 | be forced. | 
|  | 303 |  | 
|  | 304 | Please note that "forcing" consists of sending resched IPIs | 
|  | 305 | to holdout CPUs.  If that CPU really still is in an old RCU | 
|  | 306 | read-side critical section, then we really do have to wait for it. | 
|  | 307 | The assumption behing "forcing" is that the CPU is not still in | 
|  | 308 | an old RCU read-side critical section, but has not yet responded | 
|  | 309 | for some other reason. | 
|  | 310 |  | 
|  | 311 | o	"nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.  Alert | 
|  | 312 | readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very | 
|  | 313 | closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU.  This | 
|  | 314 | is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending(). |