| Robert Olsson | b2f5710 | 2005-07-05 16:38:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | LC-trie implementation notes. | 
|  | 2 |  | 
|  | 3 | Node types | 
|  | 4 | ---------- | 
|  | 5 | leaf | 
|  | 6 | An end node with data. This has a copy of the relevant key, along | 
|  | 7 | with 'hlist' with routing table entries sorted by prefix length. | 
|  | 8 | See struct leaf and struct leaf_info. | 
|  | 9 |  | 
|  | 10 | trie node or tnode | 
|  | 11 | An internal node, holding an array of child (leaf or tnode) pointers, | 
|  | 12 | indexed	through a subset of the key. See Level Compression. | 
|  | 13 |  | 
|  | 14 | A few concepts explained | 
|  | 15 | ------------------------ | 
|  | 16 | Bits (tnode) | 
|  | 17 | The number of bits in the key segment used for indexing into the | 
|  | 18 | child array - the "child index". See Level Compression. | 
|  | 19 |  | 
|  | 20 | Pos (tnode) | 
|  | 21 | The position (in the key) of the key segment used for indexing into | 
|  | 22 | the child array. See Path Compression. | 
|  | 23 |  | 
|  | 24 | Path Compression / skipped bits | 
|  | 25 | Any given tnode is linked to from the child array of its parent, using | 
|  | 26 | a segment of the key specified by the parent's "pos" and "bits" | 
|  | 27 | In certain cases, this tnode's own "pos" will not be immediately | 
|  | 28 | adjacent to the parent (pos+bits), but there will be some bits | 
|  | 29 | in the key skipped over because they represent a single path with no | 
|  | 30 | deviations. These "skipped bits" constitute Path Compression. | 
|  | 31 | Note that the search algorithm will simply skip over these bits when | 
|  | 32 | searching, making it necessary to save the keys in the leaves to | 
|  | 33 | verify that they actually do match the key we are searching for. | 
|  | 34 |  | 
|  | 35 | Level Compression / child arrays | 
|  | 36 | the trie is kept level balanced moving, under certain conditions, the | 
|  | 37 | children of a full child (see "full_children") up one level, so that | 
|  | 38 | instead of a pure binary tree, each internal node ("tnode") may | 
|  | 39 | contain an arbitrarily large array of links to several children. | 
|  | 40 | Conversely, a tnode with a mostly empty	child array (see empty_children) | 
|  | 41 | may be "halved", having some of its children moved downwards one level, | 
|  | 42 | in order to avoid ever-increasing child arrays. | 
|  | 43 |  | 
|  | 44 | empty_children | 
|  | 45 | the number of positions in the child array of a given tnode that are | 
|  | 46 | NULL. | 
|  | 47 |  | 
|  | 48 | full_children | 
|  | 49 | the number of children of a given tnode that aren't path compressed. | 
|  | 50 | (in other words, they aren't NULL or leaves and their "pos" is equal | 
|  | 51 | to this	tnode's "pos"+"bits"). | 
|  | 52 |  | 
|  | 53 | (The word "full" here is used more in the sense of "complete" than | 
|  | 54 | as the opposite of "empty", which might be a tad confusing.) | 
|  | 55 |  | 
|  | 56 | Comments | 
|  | 57 | --------- | 
|  | 58 |  | 
|  | 59 | We have tried to keep the structure of the code as close to fib_hash as | 
|  | 60 | possible to allow verification and help up reviewing. | 
|  | 61 |  | 
|  | 62 | fib_find_node() | 
|  | 63 | A good start for understanding this code. This function implements a | 
|  | 64 | straightforward trie lookup. | 
|  | 65 |  | 
|  | 66 | fib_insert_node() | 
|  | 67 | Inserts a new leaf node in the trie. This is bit more complicated than | 
|  | 68 | fib_find_node(). Inserting a new node means we might have to run the | 
|  | 69 | level compression algorithm on part of the trie. | 
|  | 70 |  | 
|  | 71 | trie_leaf_remove() | 
|  | 72 | Looks up a key, deletes it and runs the level compression algorithm. | 
|  | 73 |  | 
|  | 74 | trie_rebalance() | 
|  | 75 | The key function for the dynamic trie after any change in the trie | 
|  | 76 | it is run to optimize and reorganize. Tt will walk the trie upwards | 
|  | 77 | towards the root from a given tnode, doing a resize() at each step | 
|  | 78 | to implement level compression. | 
|  | 79 |  | 
|  | 80 | resize() | 
|  | 81 | Analyzes a tnode and optimizes the child array size by either inflating | 
| Matt LaPlante | a2ffd27 | 2006-10-03 22:49:15 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 82 | or shrinking it repeatedly until it fulfills the criteria for optimal | 
| Robert Olsson | b2f5710 | 2005-07-05 16:38:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 83 | level compression. This part follows the original paper pretty closely | 
|  | 84 | and there may be some room for experimentation here. | 
|  | 85 |  | 
|  | 86 | inflate() | 
|  | 87 | Doubles the size of the child array within a tnode. Used by resize(). | 
|  | 88 |  | 
|  | 89 | halve() | 
|  | 90 | Halves the size of the child array within a tnode - the inverse of | 
|  | 91 | inflate(). Used by resize(); | 
|  | 92 |  | 
|  | 93 | fn_trie_insert(), fn_trie_delete(), fn_trie_select_default() | 
|  | 94 | The route manipulation functions. Should conform pretty closely to the | 
|  | 95 | corresponding functions in fib_hash. | 
|  | 96 |  | 
|  | 97 | fn_trie_flush() | 
|  | 98 | This walks the full trie (using nextleaf()) and searches for empty | 
|  | 99 | leaves which have to be removed. | 
|  | 100 |  | 
|  | 101 | fn_trie_dump() | 
|  | 102 | Dumps the routing table ordered by prefix length. This is somewhat | 
|  | 103 | slower than the corresponding fib_hash function, as we have to walk the | 
|  | 104 | entire trie for each prefix length. In comparison, fib_hash is organized | 
|  | 105 | as one "zone"/hash per prefix length. | 
|  | 106 |  | 
|  | 107 | Locking | 
|  | 108 | ------- | 
|  | 109 |  | 
|  | 110 | fib_lock is used for an RW-lock in the same way that this is done in fib_hash. | 
|  | 111 | However, the functions are somewhat separated for other possible locking | 
|  | 112 | scenarios. It might conceivably be possible to run trie_rebalance via RCU | 
|  | 113 | to avoid read_lock in the fn_trie_lookup() function. | 
|  | 114 |  | 
|  | 115 | Main lookup mechanism | 
|  | 116 | --------------------- | 
|  | 117 | fn_trie_lookup() is the main lookup function. | 
|  | 118 |  | 
|  | 119 | The lookup is in its simplest form just like fib_find_node(). We descend the | 
|  | 120 | trie, key segment by key segment, until we find a leaf. check_leaf() does | 
|  | 121 | the fib_semantic_match in the leaf's sorted prefix hlist. | 
|  | 122 |  | 
|  | 123 | If we find a match, we are done. | 
|  | 124 |  | 
|  | 125 | If we don't find a match, we enter prefix matching mode. The prefix length, | 
|  | 126 | starting out at the same as the key length, is reduced one step at a time, | 
|  | 127 | and we backtrack upwards through the trie trying to find a longest matching | 
|  | 128 | prefix. The goal is always to reach a leaf and get a positive result from the | 
|  | 129 | fib_semantic_match mechanism. | 
|  | 130 |  | 
|  | 131 | Inside each tnode, the search for longest matching prefix consists of searching | 
|  | 132 | through the child array, chopping off (zeroing) the least significant "1" of | 
|  | 133 | the child index until we find a match or the child index consists of nothing but | 
|  | 134 | zeros. | 
|  | 135 |  | 
|  | 136 | At this point we backtrack (t->stats.backtrack++) up the trie, continuing to | 
|  | 137 | chop off part of the key in order to find the longest matching prefix. | 
|  | 138 |  | 
|  | 139 | At this point we will repeatedly descend subtries to look for a match, and there | 
|  | 140 | are some optimizations available that can provide us with "shortcuts" to avoid | 
|  | 141 | descending into dead ends. Look for "HL_OPTIMIZE" sections in the code. | 
|  | 142 |  | 
|  | 143 | To alleviate any doubts about the correctness of the route selection process, | 
|  | 144 | a new netlink operation has been added. Look for NETLINK_FIB_LOOKUP, which | 
|  | 145 | gives userland access to fib_lookup(). |