)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "74c3cbe33bc077ac1159cadfea608b501e100344",
      "tree": "4c4023caa4e15d19780255fa5880df3d36eb292c",
      "parents": [
        "455434d450a358ac5bcf3fc58f8913d13c544622"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Al Viro",
        "email": "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk",
        "time": "Sun Jul 22 08:04:18 2007 -0400"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Al Viro",
        "email": "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk",
        "time": "Sun Oct 21 02:37:45 2007 -0400"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] audit: watching subtrees\n\nNew kind of audit rule predicates: \"object is visible in given subtree\".\nThe part that can be sanely implemented, that is.  Limitations:\n\t* if you have hardlink from outside of tree, you\u0027d better watch\nit too (or just watch the object itself, obviously)\n\t* if you mount something under a watched tree, tell audit\nthat new chunk should be added to watched subtrees\n\t* if you umount something in a watched tree and it\u0027s still mounted\nelsewhere, you will get matches on events happening there.  New command\ntells audit to recalculate the trees, trimming such sources of false\npositives.\n\nNote that it\u0027s _not_ about path - if something mounted in several places\n(multiple mount, bindings, different namespaces, etc.), the match does\n_not_ depend on which one we are using for access.\n\nSigned-off-by: Al Viro \u003cviro@zeniv.linux.org.uk\u003e\n"
    }
  ]
}