)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "82ddcb040570411fc2d421d96b3e69711c670328",
      "tree": "fb344f5cf69968cef3739d437de97a86817c2219",
      "parents": [
        "e3e8a75d2acfc61ebf25524666a0a2c6abb0620c"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Robert P. J. Day",
        "email": "rpjday@mindspring.com",
        "time": "Sat Feb 10 01:46:20 2007 -0800"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org",
        "time": "Sun Feb 11 10:51:35 2007 -0800"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] extend the set of \"__attribute__\" shortcut macros\n\nExtend the set of \"__attribute__\" shortcut macros, and remove identical\n(and now superfluous) definitions from a couple of source files.\n\nbased on a page at robert love\u0027s blog:\n\n\thttp://rlove.org/log/2005102601\n\nextend the set of shortcut macros defined in compiler-gcc.h with the\nfollowing:\n\n#define __packed                       __attribute__((packed))\n#define __weak                         __attribute__((weak))\n#define __naked                        __attribute__((naked))\n#define __noreturn                     __attribute__((noreturn))\n#define __pure                         __attribute__((pure))\n#define __aligned(x)                   __attribute__((aligned(x)))\n#define __printf(a,b)                  __attribute__((format(printf,a,b)))\n\nOnce these are in place, it\u0027s up to subsystem maintainers to decide if they\nwant to take advantage of them.  there is already a strong precedent for\nusing shortcuts like this in the source tree.\n\nThe ones that might give people pause are \"__aligned\" and \"__printf\", but\nshortcuts for both of those are already in use, and in some ways very\nconfusingly.  note the two very different definitions for a macro named\n\"ALIGNED\":\n\n  drivers/net/sgiseeq.c:#define ALIGNED(x) ((((unsigned long)(x)) + 0xf) \u0026 ~(0xf))\n  drivers/scsi/ultrastor.c:#define ALIGNED(x) __attribute__((aligned(x)))\n\nalso:\n\n  include/acpi/platform/acgcc.h:\n    #define ACPI_PRINTF_LIKE(c) __attribute__ ((__format__ (__printf__, c, c+1)))\n\nGiven the precedent, then, it seems logical to at least standardize on a\nconsistent set of these macros.\n\nSigned-off-by: Robert P. J. Day \u003crpjday@mindspring.com\u003e\nAcked-by: Ralf Baechle \u003cralf@linux-mips.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@linux-foundation.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@linux-foundation.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "c8d52465f95c4187871f8e65666c07806ca06d41",
      "tree": "873a77cf0b47c92fbdc5cb8dd8baa7583c26bbfd",
      "parents": [
        "115b2ce1c3b974e43e45fa6c9e20cd7271a01dff"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Anton Blanchard",
        "email": "anton@samba.org",
        "time": "Tue Jan 10 18:21:20 2006 +1100"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
        "time": "Tue Jan 10 08:32:35 2006 -0800"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] Work around ppc64 compiler bug\n\nIn the process of optimising our per cpu data code, I found a ppc64\ncompiler bug that has been around forever. Basically the current\nRELOC_HIDE can end up trashing r30. Details of the bug can be found at\n\n  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id\u003d25572\n\nThis bug is present in all compilers before 4.1. It is masked by the\nfact that our current per cpu data code is inefficient and causes\nother loads that end up marking r30 as used.\n\nA workaround identified by Alan Modra is to use the \u003dr asm constraint\ninstead of \u003dg.\n\nSigned-off-by: Anton Blanchard \u003canton@samba.org\u003e\n[ Verified that this makes no real difference on x86[-64] */\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "a1365647022eb05a5993f270a78e9bef3bf554eb",
      "tree": "6dbcab4db80b7d07fdaec88c003743d1f6e1a289",
      "parents": [
        "fd285bb54d8a3e99810090ae88cfe8ed77d1da25"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Andrew Morton",
        "email": "akpm@osdl.org",
        "time": "Sun Jan 08 01:04:09 2006 -0800"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sun Jan 08 20:14:02 2006 -0800"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] remove gcc-2 checks\n\nRemove various things which were checking for gcc-1.x and gcc-2.x compilers.\n\nFrom: Adrian Bunk \u003cbunk@stusta.de\u003e\n\n    Some documentation updates and removes some code paths for gcc \u003c 3.2.\n\nAcked-by: Russell King \u003crmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Adrian Bunk \u003cbunk@stusta.de\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
      "tree": "0bba044c4ce775e45a88a51686b5d9f90697ea9d",
      "parents": [],
      "author": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "Linux-2.6.12-rc2\n\nInitial git repository build. I\u0027m not bothering with the full history,\neven though we have it. We can create a separate \"historical\" git\narchive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it\u0027s about\n3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early\ngit days unnecessarily complicated, when we don\u0027t have a lot of good\ninfrastructure for it.\n\nLet it rip!\n"
    }
  ]
}