|  | relay interface (formerly relayfs) | 
|  | ================================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to | 
|  | efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel | 
|  | to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented | 
|  | as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each | 
|  | represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space.  Kernel | 
|  | clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write | 
|  | functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel | 
|  | buffer.  User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files | 
|  | and retrieve the data as it becomes available.  The relay files | 
|  | themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and | 
|  | are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely | 
|  | up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide | 
|  | hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the | 
|  | buffer data.  The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data | 
|  | filtering - this also is left to the kernel client.  The purpose is to | 
|  | keep things as simple as possible. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This document provides an overview of the relay interface API.  The | 
|  | details of the function parameters are documented along with the | 
|  | functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Semantics | 
|  | ========= | 
|  |  | 
|  | Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more | 
|  | sub-buffers.  Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is | 
|  | too full to contain a new message, in which case it it is written to | 
|  | the next (if available).  Messages are never split across sub-buffers. | 
|  | At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first | 
|  | sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many | 
|  | bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete | 
|  | message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer.  Userspace can use this | 
|  | knowledge to copy only valid data. | 
|  |  | 
|  | After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer | 
|  | has been consumed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not | 
|  | yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such | 
|  | data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain | 
|  | simple and not impose a single interface on userspace.  It does | 
|  | provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described | 
|  | below. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the | 
|  | read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain | 
|  | the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and | 
|  | user isn't necessary for basic operation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low | 
|  | overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace.  While the | 
|  | read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap() | 
|  | approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the | 
|  | two approaches as small as possible. | 
|  |  | 
|  | klog and relay-apps example code | 
|  | ================================ | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, | 
|  | a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge | 
|  | site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a | 
|  | pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and | 
|  | kernel sides of a relay application.  When combined these two sets of | 
|  | boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without | 
|  | having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps | 
|  | tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the | 
|  | kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel, | 
|  | regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even | 
|  | whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not.  These | 
|  | functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere | 
|  | in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler' | 
|  | registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak | 
|  | examples for details). | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch, | 
|  | i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but | 
|  | you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, | 
|  | allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of | 
|  | padding).  The read() interface both removes padding and internally | 
|  | consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being | 
|  | used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication | 
|  | between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation.  Things | 
|  | such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via | 
|  | some channel though. | 
|  |  | 
|  | klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps | 
|  | tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay interface user space API | 
|  | ================================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space | 
|  | access to relay channel buffer data.  Here are the file operations | 
|  | that are available and some comments regarding their behavior: | 
|  |  | 
|  | open()	    enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | mmap()      results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's | 
|  | memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you | 
|  | must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE. | 
|  |  | 
|  | read()      read the contents of a channel buffer.  The bytes read are | 
|  | 'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available | 
|  | again to subsequent reads.  If the channel is being used | 
|  | in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any | 
|  | time even if there's an active kernel writer.  If the | 
|  | channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are | 
|  | active channel writers, results may be unpredictable - | 
|  | users should make sure that all logging to the channel has | 
|  | ended before using read() with overwrite mode.  Sub-buffer | 
|  | padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by | 
|  | the reader. | 
|  |  | 
|  | sendfile()  transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file | 
|  | descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed | 
|  | and will not be seen by the reader. | 
|  |  | 
|  | poll()      POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported.  User applications are | 
|  | notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | close()     decrements the channel buffer's refcount.  When the refcount | 
|  | reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the | 
|  | buffer open, the channel buffer is freed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the | 
|  | host filesystem must be mounted.  For example, | 
|  |  | 
|  | mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug | 
|  |  | 
|  | NOTE:   the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel | 
|  | clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be | 
|  | mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer | 
|  | data. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The relay interface kernel API | 
|  | ============================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients: | 
|  |  | 
|  | TBD(curr. line MT:/API/) | 
|  | channel management functions: | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs, | 
|  | callbacks, private_data) | 
|  | relay_close(chan) | 
|  | relay_flush(chan) | 
|  | relay_reset(chan) | 
|  |  | 
|  | channel management typically called on instigation of userspace: | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed) | 
|  |  | 
|  | write functions: | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay_write(chan, data, length) | 
|  | __relay_write(chan, data, length) | 
|  | relay_reserve(chan, length) | 
|  |  | 
|  | callbacks: | 
|  |  | 
|  | subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding) | 
|  | buf_mapped(buf, filp) | 
|  | buf_unmapped(buf, filp) | 
|  | create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global) | 
|  | remove_buf_file(dentry) | 
|  |  | 
|  | helper functions: | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay_buf_full(buf) | 
|  | subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length) | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Creating a channel | 
|  | ------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu | 
|  | channel buffers.  Each channel buffer will have an associated file | 
|  | created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or | 
|  | read from in user space.  The files are named basename0...basenameN-1 | 
|  | where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created | 
|  | in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL).  If you | 
|  | want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should | 
|  | create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function, | 
|  | e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to | 
|  | relay_open().  Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory | 
|  | structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host | 
|  | filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that, | 
|  | e.g. debugfs_remove(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files | 
|  | associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions | 
|  | for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file(). | 
|  | create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from | 
|  | relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used | 
|  | to represent the corresponding channel buffer.  The callback should | 
|  | return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer. | 
|  | remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting | 
|  | the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during | 
|  | relay_close(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case | 
|  | using debugfs: | 
|  |  | 
|  | /* | 
|  | * create_buf_file() callback.  Creates relay file in debugfs. | 
|  | */ | 
|  | static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename, | 
|  | struct dentry *parent, | 
|  | int mode, | 
|  | struct rchan_buf *buf, | 
|  | int *is_global) | 
|  | { | 
|  | return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf, | 
|  | &relay_file_operations); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /* | 
|  | * remove_buf_file() callback.  Removes relay file from debugfs. | 
|  | */ | 
|  | static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry) | 
|  | { | 
|  | debugfs_remove(dentry); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return 0; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /* | 
|  | * relay interface callbacks | 
|  | */ | 
|  | static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks = | 
|  | { | 
|  | .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler, | 
|  | .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler, | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | And an example relay_open() invocation using them: | 
|  |  | 
|  | chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL); | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel | 
|  | creation and thus relay_open() will fail. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the | 
|  | number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open(). | 
|  | The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of | 
|  | double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to | 
|  | easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can | 
|  | be important for some high-volume applications.  The number and size | 
|  | of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for | 
|  | the same application, different conditions will warrant different | 
|  | values for these parameters at different times.  Typically, the right | 
|  | values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general, | 
|  | though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad | 
|  | idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events | 
|  | depending on the channel mode being used. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way | 
|  | as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the | 
|  | default per-cpu set.  This can be useful for applications interested | 
|  | mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without | 
|  | the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of | 
|  | merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step. | 
|  |  | 
|  | To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file() | 
|  | implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a | 
|  | non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to | 
|  | represent the single buffer.  In the case of a global buffer, | 
|  | create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once.  The | 
|  | normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be | 
|  | used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global | 
|  | buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure | 
|  | they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping | 
|  | writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and | 
|  | creating a local version that internally does the proper locking. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate | 
|  | user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available | 
|  | (including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or | 
|  | buf->chan->private_data. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Buffer-only channels | 
|  | -------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | These channels have no files associated and can be created with | 
|  | relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such | 
|  | as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these | 
|  | cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call | 
|  | relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files, | 
|  | to expose the buffered data to the userspace. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Channel 'modes' | 
|  | --------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or | 
|  | 'no-overwrite'.  The mode is entirely determined by the implementation | 
|  | of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below.  The default if no | 
|  | subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode.  If the | 
|  | default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read() | 
|  | interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this | 
|  | section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes | 
|  | continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will | 
|  | unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually | 
|  | been consumed.  In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will | 
|  | be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total | 
|  | number of sub-buffers in the channel.  It should be clear that if | 
|  | there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast | 
|  | enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is | 
|  | whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more | 
|  | per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer | 
|  | subdivided into one or more sub-buffers.  Messages are written into | 
|  | the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the | 
|  | write functions described below.  Whenever a message can't fit into | 
|  | the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the | 
|  | client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a | 
|  | new sub-buffer is about to occur.  The client uses this callback to 1) | 
|  | initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous | 
|  | sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating | 
|  | whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide | 
|  | an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the | 
|  | following: | 
|  |  | 
|  | static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, | 
|  | void *subbuf, | 
|  | void *prev_subbuf, | 
|  | unsigned int prev_padding) | 
|  | { | 
|  | if (prev_subbuf) | 
|  | *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; | 
|  |  | 
|  | if (relay_buf_full(buf)) | 
|  | return 0; | 
|  |  | 
|  | subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return 1; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed, | 
|  | the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not | 
|  | occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the | 
|  | current set of ready sub-buffers.  For the relay_buf_full() function | 
|  | to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay | 
|  | interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via | 
|  | relay_subbufs_consumed().  Any subsequent attempts to write into the | 
|  | buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same | 
|  | parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the | 
|  | ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the | 
|  | buffer switch can continue. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode | 
|  | would be very similar: | 
|  |  | 
|  | static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, | 
|  | void *subbuf, | 
|  | void *prev_subbuf, | 
|  | unsigned int prev_padding) | 
|  | { | 
|  | if (prev_subbuf) | 
|  | *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; | 
|  |  | 
|  | subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); | 
|  |  | 
|  | return 1; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the | 
|  | callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur | 
|  | unconditionally.  It's also meaningless for the client to use the | 
|  | relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never | 
|  | consulted. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't | 
|  | define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback, | 
|  | implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does | 
|  | nothing but return 0. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer | 
|  | by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the | 
|  | subbuf_start() callback.  This reserved area can be used to store | 
|  | whatever information the client wants.  In the example above, room is | 
|  | reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that | 
|  | sub-buffer.  This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the | 
|  | subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous | 
|  | sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a | 
|  | pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't | 
|  | known until a sub-buffer is filled.  The subbuf_start() callback is | 
|  | also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to | 
|  | give the client a chance to reserve space in it.  In this case the | 
|  | previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so | 
|  | the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before | 
|  | writing into the previous sub-buffer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Writing to a channel | 
|  | -------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using | 
|  | relay_write() or __relay_write().  relay_write() is the main logging | 
|  | function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be | 
|  | used if you might be logging from interrupt context.  If you know | 
|  | you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use | 
|  | __relay_write(), which only disables preemption.  These functions | 
|  | don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they | 
|  | failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return | 
|  | value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed | 
|  | unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in | 
|  | which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start() | 
|  | callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function. | 
|  |  | 
|  | relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which | 
|  | can be written to later.  This would typically be used in applications | 
|  | that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to | 
|  | stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand.  Because the actual write | 
|  | may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications | 
|  | using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually | 
|  | written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as | 
|  | a separate array.  See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball | 
|  | at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be | 
|  | done.  Because the write is under control of the client and is | 
|  | separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer | 
|  | at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate | 
|  | synchronization when using relay_reserve(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Closing a channel | 
|  | ----------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel. | 
|  | The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no | 
|  | longer any references to any of the channel buffers.  relay_flush() | 
|  | forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used | 
|  | to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is | 
|  | closed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Misc | 
|  | ---- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it | 
|  | rather than open and close a new channel for each use.  relay_reset() | 
|  | can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial | 
|  | state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying | 
|  | existing mappings.  It should however only be called when it's safe to | 
|  | do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for | 
|  | different purposes.  buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer | 
|  | is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's | 
|  | unmapped.  The client can use this notification to trigger actions | 
|  | within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to | 
|  | the channel. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Resources | 
|  | ========= | 
|  |  | 
|  | For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage: | 
|  |  | 
|  | http://relayfs.sourceforge.net | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Credits | 
|  | ======= | 
|  |  | 
|  | The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of | 
|  | discussions on tracing involving the following: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Michel Dagenais		<michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca> | 
|  | Richard Moore		<richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> | 
|  | Bob Wisniewski		<bob@watson.ibm.com> | 
|  | Karim Yaghmour		<karim@opersys.com> | 
|  | Tom Zanussi		<zanussi@us.ibm.com> | 
|  |  | 
|  | Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug | 
|  | reports. |