[NETFILTER]: Introduce NF_INET_ hook values
The IPv4 and IPv6 hook values are identical, yet some code tries to figure
out the "correct" value by looking at the address family. Introduce NF_INET_*
values for both IPv4 and IPv6. The old values are kept in a #ifndef __KERNEL__
section for userspace compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 0396354..64d414e 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -5281,7 +5281,7 @@
.hook = selinux_ipv4_postroute_last,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pf = PF_INET,
- .hooknum = NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+ .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
.priority = NF_IP_PRI_SELINUX_LAST,
};
@@ -5291,7 +5291,7 @@
.hook = selinux_ipv6_postroute_last,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pf = PF_INET6,
- .hooknum = NF_IP6_POST_ROUTING,
+ .hooknum = NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
.priority = NF_IP6_PRI_SELINUX_LAST,
};