)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "7ae65fd334232468a9d6b523a4fc141cd6ec5ea4",
      "tree": "cbc63abb55033d88f9a631741603a2a379bebee2",
      "parents": [
        "4116c527ea9517623369a5b3b037aedde280d672"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Matt Tolentino",
        "email": "metolent@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com",
        "time": "Sat Sep 03 15:56:27 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@evo.osdl.org",
        "time": "Mon Sep 05 00:06:09 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] x86: fix EFI memory map parsing\n\nThe memory descriptors that comprise the EFI memory map are not fixed in\nstone such that the size could change in the future.  This uses the memory\ndescriptor size obtained from EFI to iterate over the memory map entries\nduring boot.  This enables the removal of an x86 specific pad (and ifdef)\nin the EFI header.  I also couldn\u0027t stomach the broken up nature of the\nfunction to put EFI runtime calls into virtual mode any longer so I fixed\nthat up a bit as well.\n\nFor reference, this patch only impacts x86.\n\nSigned-off-by: Matt Tolentino \u003cmatthew.e.tolentino@intel.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "986a80d5c154808cc78170584670324a22fd8219",
      "tree": "11cc27ed20f65d1693ad2883a8606fbd7822888d",
      "parents": [
        "4845f3333765b732aa2d7ea6d72fd03cfec4fbf3"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Jesper Juhl",
        "email": "juhl-lkml@dif.dk",
        "time": "Thu Jun 16 15:14:00 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Tony Luck",
        "email": "tony.luck@intel.com",
        "time": "Thu Jun 16 16:27:14 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] avoid signed vs unsigned comparison in efi_range_is_wc()\n\nwarning when building with gcc -W : \n\n include/linux/efi.h: In function `efi_range_is_wc\u0027:\n include/linux/efi.h:320: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned\n\nIt looks to me like a significantly large \u0027len\u0027 passed in could cause the \nloop to never end. Isn\u0027t it safer to make \u0027i\u0027 an unsigned long as well? \nLike this little patch below (which of course also kills the warning) :\n\nSigned-off-by: Jesper Juhl \u003cjuhl-lkml@dif.dk\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Tony Luck \u003ctony.luck@intel.com\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
      "tree": "0bba044c4ce775e45a88a51686b5d9f90697ea9d",
      "parents": [],
      "author": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "Linux-2.6.12-rc2\n\nInitial git repository build. I\u0027m not bothering with the full history,\neven though we have it. We can create a separate \"historical\" git\narchive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it\u0027s about\n3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early\ngit days unnecessarily complicated, when we don\u0027t have a lot of good\ninfrastructure for it.\n\nLet it rip!\n"
    }
  ]
}